Does context influence the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol in female DBA/2J mice?

被引:29
作者
Boehm, Stephen L., II [1 ]
Goldfarb, Karen J. [1 ]
Serio, Kristen M. [1 ]
Moore, Eileen M. [1 ]
Linsenbardt, David N. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Psychol Sci 4, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
ethanol; locomotor activity; sensitization; context; mice;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-007-1022-6
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale Repeated exposure to ethanol produces a progressive increase in locomotor sensitivity, referred to as locomotor sensitization. Locomotor sensitization may persist for some time after termination of repeated drug exposure, and context appears to facilitate expression of the behavioral phenomenon. However, many unanswered questions remain concerning the persistence of and degree to which context influences locomotor sensitization to alcohol (ethanol). Objectives The goal of the present work was to determine the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol and the degree to which context dependence positively influences the induction, expression, and persistence of the behavioral phenomenon in female DBA/2J mice. Materials and methods Sensitized (with or without ethanol-paired exposure to the testing chamber) and non-sensitized saline control mice were left undisturbed in their home cages until subsequent ethanol challenge and testing in the locomotor activity testing chambers 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, and/or 70 days after cessation of the ethanol sensitization procedure. Retro-orbital sinus bloods were sampled to determine whether the sensitization procedure had altered blood ethanol clearance rates. Results Locomotor sensitization persisted through post-sensitization day 14, and repeated paring of the drug and testing context prolonged the expression of this phenomenon through at least post-sensitization day 28. Blood ethanol concentrations did not differ. Conclusions Locomotor sensitization to ethanol persists for some time after cessation of repeated ethanol exposure, and the association of contextual cues with the ethanol experience lengthens this persistence. The present data lay the groundwork for investigations into the neuroadaptive changes that underlie locomotor sensitization to ethanol in mice.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 201
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Modulation of morphine sensitization in the rat by contextual stimuli [J].
Badiani, A ;
Oates, MM ;
Robinson, TE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 151 (2-3) :273-282
[2]   INFLUENCE OF NOVEL VERSUS HOME ENVIRONMENTS ON SENSITIZATION TO THE PSYCHOMOTOR STIMULANT EFFECTS OF COCAINE AND AMPHETAMINE [J].
BADIANI, A ;
BROWMAN, KE ;
ROBINSON, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 674 (02) :291-298
[3]   CONDITIONED ACTIVATION INDUCED BY ETHANOL - ROLE IN SENSITIZATION AND CONDITIONED PLACE PREFERENCE [J].
CUNNINGHAM, CL ;
NOBLE, D .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1992, 43 (01) :307-313
[4]   Repeated alcohol: behavioral sensitization and alcohol-heightened aggression in mice [J].
Fish, EW ;
DeBold, JF ;
Miczek, KA .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 160 (01) :39-48
[5]   EFFECT OF PREPUBERTAL OVARIECTOMY ON AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY IN ADULT FEMALE RATS [J].
FORGIE, ML ;
STEWART, J .
HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 1994, 28 (03) :241-260
[6]   A ROLE FOR BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION IN UNCONTROLLED ETHANOL INTAKE [J].
HUNT, WA ;
LANDS, WEM .
ALCOHOL, 1992, 9 (04) :327-328
[7]   Apomorphine sensitization: evoking conditions, context dependence, effect persistence and conditioned nature [J].
Keller, S ;
Delius, JD ;
Acerbo, MJ .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) :189-201
[8]   Duration of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in mice [J].
Lessov, CN ;
Phillips, TJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 135 (04) :374-382
[9]   THE EXCITATORY EFFECT OF ETHANOL - ABSENCE IN RATS, NO TOLERANCE AND INCREASED SENSITIVITY IN MICE [J].
MASUR, J ;
DESOUZA, MLO ;
ZWICKER, AP .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1986, 24 (05) :1225-1228
[10]   THE EXCITATORY COMPONENT OF ETHANOL IN MICE - A CHRONIC STUDY [J].
MASUR, J ;
BOERNGEN, R .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1980, 13 (06) :777-780