Pain assessment after original transperineal prostate biopsy using a coaxial needle

被引:45
作者
Novella, G [1 ]
Ficarra, V [1 ]
Galfano, A [1 ]
Ballario, R [1 ]
Novara, G [1 ]
Cavalleri, S [1 ]
Artibani, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Urol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00483-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives. To assess whether the use of a coaxial needle reduces discomfort in patients undergoing multiple-core transperineal prostate biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Methods. From October 2002 to January 2003, we enrolled 102 consecutive patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer. In every case, we performed a 14-core transperineal prostate biopsy under transrectal ultrasound guidance. The patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 51) in which we used the 17-gauge coaxial TruGuide needle, and group 2 (n = 51) in which the conventional transperineal technique was used. At the end of the procedure, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the level of pain experienced. Results. The studied groups were comparable in age, total prostate-specific antigen value, and prostate volume. The whole procedure was significantly less painful in group 1 (2.20 +/- 1.20 versus 2.90 +/- 1.73, P = 0.01). We failed to show any significant pain score differences during rectal probe insertion (P = 0.10), transrectal ultrasonography (P = 0.16), and execution of local anesthesia (P = 0.11). The pain score recorded during the multiple-core prostate sampling was significantly lower in group 1 (1.53 +/- 1.5 versus 2.43 +/- 1.86, P = 0.009). No statistically significant differences were found in the complication rates between the two groups. Conclusions. The use of a coaxial needle reduces the procedure's invasiveness and patient's pain compared with the conventional transperineal prostate biopsy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 692
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Buchberger W, 2002, RADIOLOGE, V42, P25, DOI 10.1007/s117-002-8113-9
[2]
ANESTHESIA FOR LASER PROSTATECTOMY [J].
COSTELLO, TG ;
COSTELLO, AJ .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1994, 22 (04) :454-457
[3]
The value of a single biopsy with 12 transperineal cores for detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen [J].
Emiliozzi, P ;
Longhi, S ;
Scarpone, P ;
Pansadoro, A ;
DePaula, F ;
Pansadoro, V .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) :845-850
[4]
Masses in or around the pancreatic head: CT-guided coaxial fine-needle aspiration biopsy with a posterior transcaval approach [J].
Gupta, S ;
Ahrar, K ;
Morello, FA ;
Wallace, MJ ;
Hicks, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (01) :63-69
[5]
PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY OF THE LIVER AND KIDNEY BY USING COAXIAL TECHNIQUE - ADEQUACY OF THE SPECIMEN OBTAINED WITH 3 DIFFERENT NEEDLES IN-VITRO [J].
HOPPER, KD ;
GRENKO, RT ;
TENHAVE, TR ;
HARTZEL, J ;
STURTZ, KW ;
SAVAGE, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (01) :221-224
[6]
THE MEASUREMENT OF CLINICAL PAIN INTENSITY - A COMPARISON OF 6 METHODS [J].
JENSEN, MP ;
KAROLY, P ;
BRAVER, S .
PAIN, 1986, 27 (01) :117-126
[7]
Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: A double-blind placebo controlled study [J].
Leibovici, D ;
Zisman, A ;
Siegel, YI ;
Sella, A ;
Kleinmann, J ;
Lindner, A .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :563-565
[8]
Milani C., 2000, UROLOGIA, V67, P136
[9]
Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate [J].
Nash, PA ;
Bruce, JE ;
Indudhara, R ;
Shinohara, K .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (02) :607-609
[10]
Optimizing local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate [J].
Schostak, M ;
Christoph, F ;
Müller, M ;
Heicappell, R ;
Goessl, G ;
Staehler, M ;
Miller, K .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (02) :253-257