The Impact of Real-Time Elastography Guiding a Systematic Prostate Biopsy to Improve Cancer Detection Rate: A Prospective Study of 353 Patients

被引:127
作者
Brock, Marko [1 ]
von Bodman, Christian [1 ]
Palisaar, Rein Jueri [1 ]
Loeppenberg, Bjoern [1 ]
Sommerer, Florian [2 ]
Deix, Thomas [1 ]
Noldus, Joachim [1 ]
Eggert, Thilo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Urol, Marienhosp Herne, D-44627 Herne, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Pathol, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Univ Klin Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; elasticity imaging techniques; biopsy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ULTRASOUND; SONOELASTOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated whether real-time elastography guided biopsy improves prostate cancer detection compared to conventional systematic gray scale ultrasound guidance. Materials and Methods: A total of 353 consecutive patients suspicious for prostate cancer were prospectively randomized for real-time elastography (178) or gray scale ultrasound (175). Each patient enrolled in the study underwent a 10-core prostate biopsy. Six lateral prostate sectors (base, mid, apex) were scanned for cancer suspicious areas, defined as stiffer blue lesions using real-time elastography and hypoechoic lesions using gray scale ultrasound. Suspicious areas were sampled by a single targeted biopsy and considered representative of a defined prostate sector. If real-time elastography or gray scale ultrasound did not visualize a suspicious area in a sector, the biopsy core was taken systematically. Imaging findings were correlated with histopathological reports. Real-time elastography and gray scale ultrasound cases were compared in terms of cancer detection rate and imaging guidance accuracy. Results: Characteristics of patients undergoing real-time elastography and gray scale ultrasound, including age, prostate specific antigen, prostate volume and digital rectal examination, were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Prostate cancer was detected in 160 of 353 patients (45.3%). The prostate cancer detection rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent biopsy with the real-time elastography guided approach compared to the gray scale ultrasound guided biopsy at 51.1% (91 of 178) vs 39.4% (69 of 175) (p = 0.027). Overall sensitivity and specificity to detect prostate cancer was 60.8% and 68.4% for real-time elastography vs 15% and 92.3% for gray scale ultrasound, respectively. Conclusions: Sensitivity to visualize and detect prostate cancer improved using real-time elastography in addition to gray scale ultrasound during prostate biopsy. Overall sensitivity did not reach levels to omit a systematic biopsy approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2039 / 2043
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Value of Real-Time Elastography Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection in Men With Prostate Specific Antigen 1.25 ng/ml or Greater and 4.00 ng/ml or Less [J].
Aigner, Friedrich ;
Pallwein, Leo ;
Junker, Daniel ;
Schaefer, Georg ;
Mikuz, Gregor ;
Pedross, Florian ;
Mitterberger, Michael Josef ;
Jaschke, Werner ;
Halpern, Ethan J. ;
Frauscher, Ferdinand .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03) :913-917
[2]
Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy [J].
Brock, Marko ;
von Bodman, Christian ;
Sommerer, Florian ;
Loeppenberg, Bjoern ;
Klein, Tobias ;
Deix, Thomas ;
Palisaar, Jueri Rein ;
Noldus, Joachim ;
Eggert, Thilo .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E217-E222
[3]
Prostate Cancer Detection Rate in Patients with Repeated Extended 21-Sample Needle Biopsy [J].
Campos-Fernandes, Jean-Louis ;
Bastien, Laurence ;
Nicolaiew, Nathalie ;
Robert, Gregoire ;
Terry, Stephane ;
Vacherot, Francis ;
Salomon, Laurent ;
Allory, Yves ;
Vordos, Dimitri ;
Hoznek, Andras ;
Yiou, Rene ;
Patard, Jean Jacques ;
Abbou, Claude Clement ;
de la Taille, Alexandre .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (03) :600-609
[4]
Eggert T, 2008, UROLOGE, V47, P1212, DOI 10.1007/s00120-008-1838-7
[5]
Detection of prostate cancer with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent [J].
Frauscher, F ;
Klauser, A ;
Halpern, EJ ;
Horninger, W ;
Bartsch, G .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9271) :1849-1850
[6]
Saturation Biopsy of the Prostate: Why Saturation Does Not Saturate [J].
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
di Lorenzo, Giuseppe .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (04) :619-621
[7]
Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: Sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence [J].
Haas, Gabriel P. ;
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Jones, Richard F. ;
Chandan, Vishal ;
Serio, Angel M. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Jumbelic, Mary ;
Threatte, Gregory ;
Korets, Rus ;
Lilja, Hans ;
de la Roza, Gustavo .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (19) :1484-1489
[8]
Heidenreich A, 2008, EUR UROL, V53, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.002
[9]
Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate [J].
König, K ;
Scheipers, U ;
Pesavento, A ;
Lorenz, A ;
Ermert, H ;
Senge, T .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01) :115-117
[10]
Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression [J].
Krouskop, TA ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Kallel, F ;
Garra, BS ;
Hall, T .
ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1998, 20 (04) :260-274