Dose dependent effects on bone resorption and formation of intermittently administered intravenous ibandronate

被引:29
作者
Chritiansen, C
Tankó, LB
Warming, L
Moelgaard, A
Christgau, S
Qvist, P
Baumann, M
Wieczorek, L
Hoyle, N
机构
[1] Ctr Clin & Basic Res AS, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark
[2] Nord Biosci AS, Herlev, Denmark
[3] F Hoffmann La Roche & Co Ltd, Integrated Hlth Care Solut, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[4] Roche Diagnost GmbH, Centralised Diagnost, Dept Bone Metab & Anaemia, Penzberg, Germany
关键词
bisphosphonates; bone markers; intermittent intravenous therapy; postmenopausal women; serial measurements;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-003-1409-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the present paper was to delineate in detail the dose-dependent effects of intermittent intravenous (IV) ibandronate treatment on the dynamics of markers of bone resorption and formation. The study included 73 healthy postmenopausal women between 50 and 70 years of age. Two groups received an IV injection of either 1 mg or 2 mg ibandronate on day 0 and 84 and one group, which received no treatment, served as control. Study duration was 168 days. Bone turnover was estimated by measuring the serum concentration of the C-terminal collagen I telopeptide (s-CTx, bone resorption) and osteocalcin (s-OC, bone formation) at 19 consecutive time-points. Serum CTx decreased rapidly reaching a nadir 7 days after drug administration. Maximal changes from baseline in the 1 and 2 mg ibandronate groups were -81% and -90%, respectively (P<0.001). However, already 2 weeks after drug administration, s-CTx started to rise again in both treatment groups, reaching -16% and -20% by day 84, i.e. immediately before the second drug administration. In contrast, s-OC showed a slower but progressive decrease over time reaching a nadir at -35% inhibition after 5 months. On a group level, the suppression of bone resorption was greater or equal to the suppression of bone formation at all time points. However, the least significant change (LSC) analysis performed at the individual level highlighted individuals who at certain time points showed apparently greater suppression of formation than resorption, which could also contribute to the inefficacy of this dosing regime. Although the physiological relevance of this latter finding would require further analysis, the results draw attention to the need to optimize the intermittent IV dosing of ibandronate in order to approximate more closely the sustained and balanced anti-resorptive effect provided by daily oral treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 613
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Adami S, 2002, J BONE MINER RES, V17, pS472
[2]   Serum CrossLaps for monitoring the response in individuals undergoing antiresorptive therapy [J].
Christgau, S ;
Bitsch-Jensen, O ;
Bjarnason, NH ;
Henriksen, EG ;
Qvist, P ;
Alexandersen, P ;
Henriksen, DB .
BONE, 2000, 26 (05) :505-511
[3]   Esophagitis associated with the use of alendronate [J].
deGroen, PC ;
Lubbe, DF ;
Hirsch, LJ ;
Daifotis, A ;
Stephenson, W ;
Freedholm, D ;
PryorTillotson, S ;
Seleznick, MJ ;
Pinkas, H ;
Wang, KK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (14) :1016-1021
[4]  
Delmas PD, 2000, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V11, pS2, DOI 10.1007/s001980070002
[5]  
Ettinger B, 1998, AM J MANAG CARE, V4, P1377
[6]  
Okabe R, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P1410
[7]   The effect on bone mass and bone markers of different doses of ibandronate: A new bisphosphonate for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: A 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding study [J].
Ravn, P ;
Clemmesen, B ;
Riis, BJ ;
Christiansen, C .
BONE, 1996, 19 (05) :527-533
[8]   Biochemical markers can predict the response in bone mass during alendronate treatment in early postmenopausal women [J].
Ravn, P ;
Clemmesen, B ;
Christiansen, C .
BONE, 1999, 24 (03) :237-244
[9]  
Recker RR, 2000, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V11, pS209
[10]  
ROSENQUIST C, 1995, CLIN CHEM, V41, P1439