A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of nortriptyline for chronic low back pain

被引:122
作者
Atkinson, JH
Slater, MA
Williams, RA
Zisook, S
Patterson, TL
Grant, I
Wahlgren, DR
Abramson, I
Garfin, SR
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat 0603, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
[3] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
[4] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, Dept Res, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
[5] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, Surg Serv, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Math, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[9] San Diego State Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Behav Epidemiol & Community Hlth, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
antidepressants; analgesia; back pain;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00064-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
To assess the efficacy of nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, as an analgesic in chronic back pain without depression, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial in 78 men recruited from primary care and general orthopedic settings, who had chronic low back pain (pain at T-6 or below on a daily basis for 6 months or longer). Of these 57 completed the trial; of the 21 who did nor complete, four were withdrawn because of adverse effects. The intervention consisted of inert placebo or nortriptyline titrated to within the therapeutic range for treating major depression (50-150 ng/ml). The main outcome endpoints were pain (Descriptor Differential Scale), disability (Sickness Impact Profile), health-related quality of life (Quality of Well-Being Scale), mood (Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory, Hamilton Anxiety/Depression Rating Scales), and physician rated outcome (Clinical Global Impression). Reduction in pain intensity scores was significantly greater for participants randomized to nortriptyline (difference in mean change 1.68, 95% -0.001, CI -3.36, P = 0.050), with a reduction of pain by 22% compared to 9% on placebo. Reduction in disability marginally favored nortriptyline (P = 0.055), but health-related quality of life, mood, and physician ratings of overall outcome did not differ significantly between treatments. Subgroup analyses of study completers supported the intent-to-treat analysis. Also, completers with radicular pain on nortriptyline (n = 5) had significantly (P < 0.05) better analgesia and overall outcome than did those on placebo (n = 6). The results suggest noradrenergic mechanisms are relevant to analgesia in back pain. This modest reduction in pain intensity suggests that physicians should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of nortriptyline in chronic back pain without depression. (C) 1998 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 296
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] ALCOFF J, 1982, J FAM PRACTICE, V14, P841
  • [2] [Anonymous], STAI MANUAL STATE TR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1987, Spine, DOI DOI 10.1097/00007632-198701000-00001
  • [4] PREVALENCE, ONSET, AND RISK OF PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS IN MEN WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    ATKINSON, JH
    SLATER, MA
    PATTERSON, TL
    GRANT, I
    GARFIN, SR
    [J]. PAIN, 1991, 45 (02) : 111 - 121
  • [5] ATKINSON JH, 1993, HDB PAIN MANAGEMENT, P181
  • [6] BALDESSARINI RJ, 1989, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V50, P117
  • [7] Beck A.T., 1967, DEPRESSION
  • [8] PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION
    BECK, AT
    STEER, RA
    GARBIN, MG
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) : 77 - 100
  • [9] BROADHEAD WE, 1991, J FAM PRACTICE, V33, P24
  • [10] COSTA CP, 1991, REV MICROBIOL, V22, P263