Ion release from NiTi orthodontic wires in artificial saliva with various acidities

被引:231
作者
Huang, HH
Chiu, YH
Lee, TH
Wu, SC
Yang, HW
Su, KH
Hsu, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Dent Mat, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[3] Chungtai Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Dent Technol, Taichung 406, Taiwan
[4] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Nutrit Sci, Taichung 402, Taiwan
关键词
ion release; NiTi; orthodontic wire; Ni; Ti; pH;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00188-1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
NiTi orthodontic wire products from different manufacturers would have different corrosion resistance. We assayed the corrosion resistance, in terms of ion release, of different NiTi orthodontic wires in artificial saliva with various acidities. Four types of as-received commercial NiTi orthodontic wires were immersed in artificial saliva (37degreesC) at pH 2.5-6.25 for different periods (1-28 d). The amount of Ni and Ti ions released from NiTi wires was determined using an atomic adsorption spectrophotometer. Surface morphology and roughness of wires were related to the corrosion resistance. Results showed that the manufacturer, pH value, and immersion period, respectively, had a significantly statistical influence on the release amount of Ni and Ti ions. The amount of Ni ions released in all test solutions was well below the critical value necessary to induce allergy and below daily dietary intake level. The amount of Ti ions released in pHgreater than or equal to3.75 solution was mostly not detectable, representing that the TiO2 film on NiTi wires exhibited a good protection against corrosion. Pre-existed surface defects on NiTi wires might be the preferred locations for corrosion. The NiTi wire with the highest release amount of metal ions had the maximal increase in surface roughness after immersion test, while a rougher surface did not correspond to a higher metal ion release. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3585 / 3592
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ABIKO Y, 1996, J JPN SOC DENT PRODU, V9, P9
[2]  
BARRETT RD, 1993, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V103, P243
[3]   NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE ORTHODONTIC PATIENT [J].
BASS, JK ;
FINE, H ;
CISNEROS, GJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1993, 103 (03) :280-285
[4]  
BergerGorbet M, 1996, J BIOMED MATER RES, V32, P243, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199610)32:2<243::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-K
[6]  
GEISGERSTORFER J, 1985, DEUT ZAHNAERZTL Z, V40, P87
[7]  
GRIMSDOTTIR M R, 1992, European Journal of Orthodontics, V14, P47
[8]  
HUANG HH, IN PRESS J BIOMED MA
[9]  
Hunt NP, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P433
[10]  
Iijima M, 2001, Dent Mater J, V20, P103