Persistent demographic differences in colorectal cancer screening utilization despite Medicare reimbursement

被引:61
作者
Ko, CW
Kreuter, W
Baldwin, LM
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Ctr Cost & Outcomes Res, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-230X-5-10
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer screening is widely recommended, but often under-utilized. In addition, significant demographic differences in screening utilization exist. Insurance coverage may be one factor influencing utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of claims for outpatient services for Washington state Medicare beneficiaries in calendar year 2000. We determined the proportion of beneficiaries utilizing screening fecal occult blood tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or double contrast barium enema in the overall population and various demographic subgroups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relative odds of screening in different demographic groups. Results: Approximately 9.2% of beneficiaries had fecal occult blood tests, 7.2% had any colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or barium enema (invasive) colon tests, and 3.5% had invasive tests for screening indications. Colonoscopy accounted for 41% of all invasive tests for screening indications. Women were more likely to receive fecal occult blood test screening (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.15, 1.21) and less likely to receive invasive tests for screening indications than men (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.77, 0.83). Whites were more likely than other racial groups to receive any type of screening. Rural residents were more likely than urban residents to have fecal occult blood tests (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17, 1.23) but less likely to receive invasive tests for screening indications ( OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.85, 0.93). Conclusion: Reported use of fecal occult blood testing remains modest. Overall use of the more invasive tests for screening indications remains essentially unchanged, but there has been a shift toward increased use of screening colonoscopy. Significant demographic differences in screening utilization persist despite consistent insurance coverage.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Colorectal cancer screening, 1997-1999: role of income, insurance and policy [J].
Adams, EK ;
Thorpe, KE ;
Becker, ER ;
Joski, PJ ;
Flome, J .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (05) :551-557
[2]  
BOUBEIDI MA, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, pS113
[3]   American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997 [J].
Byers, T ;
Levin, B ;
Rothenberger, D ;
Dodd, GD ;
Smith, RA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (03) :154-&
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P193
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2001, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V50, P162
[6]   Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries [J].
Cooper, GS ;
Koroukian, SM .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (02) :418-424
[7]   The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening - The Katie Couric effect [J].
Cram, P ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Inadomi, J ;
Cowen, ME ;
Carpenter, D ;
Vijan, S .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (13) :1601-1605
[8]   Accuracy and completeness of medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer [J].
Du, XL ;
Freeman, JL ;
Warren, JL ;
Nattinger, AB ;
Zhang, D ;
Goodwin, JS .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (07) :719-727
[9]   Fecal occult blood test use by Kansas Medicare beneficiaries [J].
Engelman, KK ;
Ellerbeck, EF ;
Ahluwalia, JS ;
Nazir, N ;
Velasco, A .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (06) :622-626
[10]   THE ACCURACY OF MEDICARES HOSPITAL CLAIMS DATA - PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE, BUT PROBLEMS REMAIN [J].
FISHER, ES ;
WHALEY, FS ;
KRUSHAT, WM ;
MALENKA, DJ ;
FLEMING, C ;
BARON, JA ;
HSIA, DC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (02) :243-248