Forceps and vacuum delivery: A survey of North American residency programs

被引:29
作者
Bofill, JA
Rust, OA
Perry, KG
Roberts, WE
Martin, RW
Morrison, JC
机构
[1] Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Univ. of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
[2] Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Univ. of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00208-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To document resident instruction in operative vaginal delivery by forceps and vacuum. Methods: A survey was sent to all 291 obstetrics-gynecology training programs in the United States and Canada. Results: The overall response rate was 72% (210 of 291). Most programs (60%) have an operative vaginal delivery rate of 10% or less. Nearly all of the responding programs (199 of 209, 95%) teach operative vaginal delivery via the vacuum route; metallic cups are used in only 14% of centers. Forceps are the primary instrument in most programs (68%), but nearly one-third of responding centers use the vacuum method mom often than forceps, instruction in midpelvic operative vaginal delivery is offered in 64% of the programs, with forceps being more common by nearly a two-to-one ratio. Deep transverse arrest is handled initially by forceps by half of the respondents, whereas 28 and 22% would proceed with cesarean or attempt a vacuum extraction, respectively. Conclusion: Instruction in both types of operative vaginal delivery is found in most programs. The forceps are used more commonly, but vacuum is the preferred instrument in about one-third of training programs. instruction in midpelvic delivery is offered in 64% of programs, but we noted a declining trend.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 625
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] BERKUS MD, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P503
  • [2] BROEKHUIZEN FF, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P338
  • [3] THE OBSTETRIC VACUUM EXTRACTOR IS THE INSTRUMENT OF 1ST CHOICE FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY
    CHALMERS, JA
    CHALMERS, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05): : 505 - 506
  • [4] CUNNINGHAM FG, 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTETRICS, P555
  • [5] DELL DL, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P624
  • [6] MIDFORCEPS DELIVERIES - LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF INFANTS
    DIERKER, LJ
    ROSEN, MG
    THOMPSON, K
    LYNN, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 154 (04) : 764 - 768
  • [7] HAGADORNFREATHY AS, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P356
  • [8] SURVEY OF OBSTETRIC FORCEPS TRAINING IN NORTH-AMERICA IN 1981
    HEALY, DL
    LAUFE, LE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [9] WORLDWIDE SURVEY OF ASSISTED VAGINAL DELIVERY
    HILLIER, CEM
    JOHANSON, RB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1994, 47 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [10] NORTH-STAFFORDSHIRE WIGAN ASSISTED DELIVERY TRIAL
    JOHANSON, R
    PUSEY, J
    LIVERA, N
    JONES, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05): : 537 - 544