CONTRACTS EX MACHINA

被引:17
作者
Werbach, Kevin [1 ]
Cornell, Nicolas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Legal Studies & Business Eth Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Law, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
CIVIL RECOURSE; UNCONSCIONABILITY; PROMISES; CONSENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Smart contracts are self-executing digital transactions using decentralized cryptographic mechanisms for enforcement. They were theorized more than twenty years ago, but the recent development of Bitcoin and blockchain technologies has rekindled excitement about their potential among technologists and industry. Startup companies and major enterprises alike are now developing smart contract solutions for an array of markets, purporting to offer a digital bypass around traditional contract law. For legal scholars, smart contracts pose a significant question: Do smart contracts offer a superior solution to the problems that contract law addresses? In this article, we aim to understand both the potential and the limitations of smart contracts. We conclude that smart contracts offer novel possibilities, may significantly alter the commercial world, and will demand new legal responses. But smart contracts will not displace contract law. Understanding why not brings into focus the essential role of contract law as a remedial institution. In this way, smart contracts actually illuminate the role of contract law more than they obviate it.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 382
页数:70
相关论文
共 208 条
  • [1] Allison Ian, 2016, INT BUS TIMES 0418
  • [2] Allison Ian, 2016, INT BUS TIMES 1110
  • [3] Ametrano Ferdinando, 2017, COINDESK 0104
  • [4] Amirtha Tina, 2015, FAST CO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, BITCOIN PEER T UNPUB
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, STAN. TECH. L. REV.
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, MARKET CAPITALIZATIO
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2015, BLACK BOX SOC
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2015, COINDESK 0107
  • [10] [Anonymous], U CHI L REV