Estimates of sulfate aerosol wet scavenging coefficient for locations in the Eastern United States

被引:52
作者
Andronache, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
关键词
sulfate; wet deposition; AIRMoN; acid rain; cloud;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scavenging of atmospheric aerosols by falling precipitation is a major removal mechanism for airborne particles. The process can be described by a wet scavenging coefficient (WSC), denoted L, that is dependent on the rainfall rate, R, and the collision efficiency between raindrops and aerosol particles, E. We report bulk average L values for location in the Eastern United States, estimated based on sulfate mass balance in the atmospheric domain of interest. Data used are taken from several observational networks: (a) the Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring Network (AIRMoN) which is part of the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NADP/NTN); (b) the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visibility Environments (IMPROVE); and (c) the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). The results are fitted relatively well by L values computed using a microphysical representation of the WSC process based on collision efficiency and precipitation size distribution. Such representation leads to a simple expression L = f (R) for soluble aerosols, suitable for WSC description in regional scale models. The agreement between the bulk method and the microphysical representation is due in part to the predominant widespread precipitation, well represented by Marshall and Palmer raindrop distribution, and in part due to assumptions made in the bulk model. Results indicate that high-resolution rainfall rates and realistic vertical cloud structure information are needed to improve the accuracy of aerosol wet scavenging modeling for pollution studies. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 804
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Estimated variability of below-cloud aerosol removal by rainfall for observed aerosol size distributions [J].
Andronache, C .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :131-143
[2]   NOTE ON CONCEPTS OF AGE DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSIT-TIME IN NATURAL RESERVOIRS [J].
BOLIN, B ;
RODHE, H .
TELLUS, 1973, 25 (01) :58-62
[3]   SCAVENGING OF SUBMICROMETER AEROSOL-PARTICLES BY WATER DROPS [J].
BYRNE, MA ;
JENNINGS, SG .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1993, 27 (14) :2099-2105
[4]   ESTIMATES OF NITRATE FORMATION IN RAIN AND SNOW SYSTEMS [J].
CHANG, TY .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1986, 91 (D2) :2805-2818
[5]   STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF WASHOUT OF POLYDISPERSE AEROSOLS [J].
DANA, MT ;
HALES, JM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1976, 10 (01) :45-50
[6]  
FLOSSMANN AI, 1985, J ATMOS SCI, V42, P583, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0583:ATSOTW>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
FLOSSMANN AI, 1987, J ATMOS SCI, V44, P2912, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2912:ATSOTW>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Monthly and annual bias in weekly (NADP/NTN) versus daily (AIRMoN) precipitation chemistry data in the Eastern USA [J].
Gilliland, AB ;
Butler, TJ ;
Likens, GE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (33) :5197-5206