The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints

被引:114
作者
Lassere, Marissa N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, St George Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0962280207082719
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There are clear advantages to using biomarkers and surrogate endpoints, but concerns about clinical and statistical validity and systematic methods to evaluate these aspects hinder their efficient application. Section 2 is a systematic, historical review of the biomarker-surrogate endpoint literature with special reference to the nomenclature, the systems of classification and statistical methods developed for their evaluation. In Section 3 an explicit, criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema - is proposed to evaluate and co-ordinate the multiple dimensions (biological, epidemiological, statistical, clinical trial and risk-benefit evidence) of the biomarker clinical endpoint relationships. The schema systematically evaluates and ranks the surrogacy status of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints using defined levels of evidence. The schema incorporates the three independent domains: Study Design, Target Outcome and Statistical Evaluation. Each domain has items ranked from zero to five. An additional category called Penalties incorporates additional considerations of biological plausibility, risk-benefit and generalizability. The total score (0-15) determines the level of evidence, with Level I the strongest and Level 5 the weakest. The term 'surrogate' is restricted to markers attaining Levels 1 or 2 only. Surrogacy status of markers can then be directly compared within and across different areas of medicine to guide individual, trial-based or drug-development decisions. This schema would facilitate communication between clinical, researcher, regulatory, industry and consumer participants necessary for evaluation of the biomarker-surrogate-clinical endpoint relationship in their different settings.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 340
页数:38
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]   Multiple risk intervention trial in high risk hypertensive men: comparison of ultrasound intima-media thickness and clinical outcome during 6 years of follow-up [J].
Agewall, S ;
Fagerberg, B ;
Berglund, G ;
Schmidt, C ;
Wendelhag, I ;
Wikstrand, J .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 249 (04) :305-314
[2]  
AICKIN M, 1994, J CELL BIOCHEM, P91
[3]  
Albert JM, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2435, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981115)17:21&lt
[4]  
2435::AID-SIM994&gt
[5]  
3.3.CO
[6]  
2-7
[7]   Prentice's approach and the meta-analytic paradigm: A reflection on the role of statistics in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints [J].
Alonso, A ;
Molenberghs, G ;
Burzykowski, T ;
Renard, D ;
Geys, H ;
Shkedy, Z ;
Tibaldi, F ;
Abrahantes, JC ;
Buyse, M .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) :724-728
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V321, P406
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1988, AM J CARDIOL, V61, P501
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fed Regist, V57, P58942