Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography in singleton and multiple pregnancies

被引:79
作者
Taylor, MJO
Smith, MJ
Thomas, M
Green, AR
Cheng, F
Oseku-Afful, S
Wee, LY
Fisk, NM
Gardiner, HM
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Queen Charlottes & Chelsea Hosp, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol, London W6 0XG, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Queen Charlottes & Chelsea Hosp, Ctr Fetal Care, London W6 0XG, England
[3] QinetiQ, Adv Signal Proc Grp, Malvern, Worcs, England
[4] Royal Brompton & Harefield Hosp, Dept Fetal Cardiol, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-0328(03)02005-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To document the duration of fetal cardiac time intervals in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies using a novel non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (fECG) system and to demonstrate this technique's ability to acquire recordings in twin and triplet pregnancies. Design Prospective cross sectional observational study. Setting Antenatal wards and clinics, day assessment unit and centre for fetal care at a tertiary referral hospital, London, UK. Population or Sample Three hundred and four singleton and multiple pregnancies, 15-41 weeks of gestation. Methods Using electrodes sited on the maternal abdomen, a fetal electrocardiography (fECG) system was developed and tested on 304 pregnant women from 15 to 41 weeks of gestation, of whom 241 were uncomplicated singletons, 58 had twin and 5 had triplet pregnancies. The composite abdominal signals were stored on a laptop computer and the fECG derived off-line using a digital signal processing technique. For singletons, linear regression was used to analyse PR, QRS, QT and QTc intervals, and construct time-specific reference ranges. Main outcome measure Duration of fECG time intervals as a function of gestational age. Success of signal separation in singleton, twin and triplet pregnancies. Results For singletons, a total of 250 recordings was obtained from 241 individuals with a signal separation success rate of 85% (213/250). Success rates were significantly poorer between 27 and 36 weeks of gestation (2 x k chi(2), p < 0.0001), with 84% (31/37) of separation failures occurring during this period. P, Q, R and S waves were seen in all cases where fetal signals were separated and were used to generate fECG time interval reference ranges. In 22% (43/199) of analysed cases, no T waves were identified, 63% (27/43) of whom were less than or equal to24 weeks of gestation. In twins and triplets, separate fetal signals were obtained in 78% (91/ 116) and 93% (14/15), respectively; P, Q, R and S waves were evident in all averaged fECGs, while T waves were identified in 59% (54/91) and 57% (8/14). Conclusions This study provides reference ranges with gestation for fECG intervals derived non-invasively from normal singleton pregnancies and demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining complete fECG recordings non-invasively across a wide gestational range in pregnancies of all pluralities. The fECG time intervals described will enable the identification of pathological fECG recordings from high risk pregnancies where fECG abnormalities are suspected.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 678
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   QUANTIFICATION OF THE FETAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM USING AVERAGING TECHNIQUE [J].
ABBOUD, S ;
BARKAI, G ;
MASHIACH, S ;
SADEH, D .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1990, 20 (03) :147-155
[2]   Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring:: a Swedish randomised controlled trial [J].
Amer-Wählin, I ;
Hellsten, C ;
Norén, H ;
Hagberg, H ;
Herbst, A ;
Kjellmer, I ;
Lilja, H ;
Lindoff, C ;
Månsson, M ;
Mårtensson, L ;
Olofsson, P ;
Sundström, AK ;
Marsál, K .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9281) :534-538
[3]   REAL-TIME FETAL ECG RECORDING [J].
BERGVELD, P ;
KOLLING, AJ ;
PEUSCHER, JHJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1986, 33 (05) :505-509
[4]   THE INTRAVENTRICULAR-CONDUCTION TIME OF FETAL HEART IN UNCOMPLICATED PREGNANCIES [J].
BRAMBATI, B ;
PARDI, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (11) :941-948
[5]  
*CESDI, 2001, CONF ENQ STILL BIRTH
[6]   IMPROVED EQUIPMENT FOR ABDOMINAL FETAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM RECORDING - DESCRIPTION AND CLINICAL-EVALUATION [J].
CICINELLI, E ;
BORTONE, A ;
CARBONARA, I ;
INCAMPO, G ;
BOCHICCHIO, M ;
VENTURA, G ;
MONTANARO, S ;
ALOISIO, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-MEDICAL COMPUTING, 1994, 35 (03) :193-205
[7]  
Cremer M., 1906, MIINCH MED WOCHENSCH, V53, P811
[8]   Antenatal assessment using the FECG obtained via abdominal electrodes [J].
Crowe, JA ;
Woolfson, MS ;
HayesGill, BR ;
Peasgood, W ;
MohdAli, MA ;
Huang, Y ;
Herbert, J ;
Huang, XB ;
Harrison, A ;
Gibson, NM ;
Symonds, EM ;
Reed, N ;
Mohajer, M .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (01) :43-53
[9]   Fetal electrocardiogram extraction by blind source subspace separation [J].
De Lathauwer, L ;
De Moor, B ;
Vandewalle, O .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 47 (05) :567-572
[10]  
Duncan KR, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P1227, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199712)17:13<1227::AID-PD328>3.0.CO