The effect of different temporary abdominal closure techniques on fascial wound healing and postoperative adhesions in experimental secondary peritonitis

被引:21
作者
Aydin, Cagatay [1 ]
Aytekin, Faruk O. [1 ]
Yenisey, Cigdem [1 ]
Kabay, Burhan [1 ]
Erdem, Ergun [1 ]
Kocbil, Goksel [1 ]
Tekin, Koray [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Tip Fak, Genel Cerrahi AD, TR-20070 Denizli, Turkey
关键词
secondary peritonitis; temporary abdominal closure; wound healing;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-007-0189-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Secondary peritonitis causes considerable mortality and morbidity. New strategies have been introduced like relaparotomy and temporary abdominal closure in the management of such persistent intra-abdominal infections. Materials and methods Rats were divided into five groups each having ten animals. After induction of peritonitis, relaparotomies were done, and the abdomen was closed by different temporary abdominal closure techniques. After performing two relaparotomies during a 48-h period, all fascias closed primarily and incisional tensile strengths, hydroxyproline contents, and adhesions were measured on the following seventh day. Results The median values of tensile strength and hydroxyproline concentrations were lowest in skin-only closure rats. Intraperitoneal adhesion scores were highest in Bogota bag closure group. Conclusion Primary, Bogota bag, and polyprolene mesh closures seem to be safe in terms of early fascial wound healing. Although it is easy to perform, skin-only closure technique has deleterious effects on fascial wound healing probably due to fascial retraction. Interestingly, Bogota bag has caused increased intraperitoneal adhesion formation.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
Role of a hyaluronic-acid derivative in preventing surgical adhesions and abscesses related to dropped bile and gallstones in an experimental model [J].
Aytekin, FO ;
Tekin, K ;
Kabay, B ;
Erdem, E ;
Erbis, H ;
Ozden, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (03) :288-293
[2]
Barbul A, 2005, SCHWARTZ PRINCIPLES, V8th, P223
[3]
Temporary closure of the abdomen using a new composite prosthesis (PL-PU99) [J].
Bellón, JM ;
Garcífa-Honduvilla, N ;
Carnicer, E ;
Serrano, N ;
Rodríguez, M ;
Buján, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (03) :314-320
[4]
BROCK WB, 1995, AM SURGEON, V61, P30
[5]
Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation [J].
diZeregal, GS ;
Campeau, JD .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2001, 7 (06) :547-555
[6]
THE CAUSES AND PREVENTION OF INTESTINAL ADHESIONS [J].
ELLIS, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (05) :241-243
[7]
Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Ellis, H ;
Moran, BJ ;
Thompson, JN ;
Parker, MC ;
Wilson, MS ;
Menzies, D ;
McGuire, A ;
Lower, AM ;
Hawthorn, RJS ;
O'Brien, F ;
Buchan, S ;
Crowe, AM .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9163) :1476-1480
[8]
Damage control in trauma: Laparotomy wound management acute to chronic [J].
Fabian, Timothy C. .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 87 (01) :73-+
[9]
Feliciano DV, 1991, ADV TRAUMA CRITICAL, V6, P231
[10]
Fascial incisions heal faster than skin: A new model of abdominal wall repair [J].
Franz, MG ;
Smith, PD ;
Wachtel, TL ;
Wright, TE ;
Kuhn, MA ;
Ko, F ;
Robson, MC .
SURGERY, 2001, 129 (02) :203-208