Who is being tested for genital chlamydia in primary care?

被引:32
作者
Kufeji, O
Slack, R
Cassell, JA
Pugh, S
Hayward, A
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
[2] Queens Med Ctr, Publ Hlth Lab Serv, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[3] UCL, Ctr Infect Dis Epidemiol, Dept Primary Care & Populat Sci, London, England
[4] UCL, Dept Sexually Transmitted Dis, London, England
[5] Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Dept Sexually Transmitted Dis, London WC1E 6AU, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/sti.79.3.234
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: To explore current patterns of testing for genital chlamydial infection in primary care, and to identify practice characteristics influencing testing rates. Method: Aggregate numbers of chlamydia tests and results for each practice in Nottingham Health District were matched to practice characteristics. Age specific testing rates and diagnosed prevalence were calculated, and characteristics of the practice tested for association with chlamydia testing rates. Results: Most tests (63.1%) were performed on women over the age of 25, but the proportion of positive tests was highest in 15-19 year olds (13.3%) followed by 20-24 year olds (8.2%). A higher ratio of GP principals to female practice population was associated with higher testing rates and more chlamydia isolations, but the ratio of female GP principals to patients was associated with higher testing rates only in 20-24 year olds. Diagnosed incidence was greatest in more socioeconomically deprived practice populations, and this was not explained by higher testing rates. Men were rarely tested. Conclusion: Current testing practice in primary care does not reflect the known epidemiology of genital chlamydia infection. Practices with lower doctor-patient ratios do less testing, and measures to enable their active participation in the envisaged screening programme will be important in reaching all at-risk groups.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 236
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Consultation patterns and provision of contraception in general practice before teenage pregnancy: case-control study [J].
Churchill, D ;
Allen, J ;
Pringle, M ;
Hippisley-Cox, J ;
Ebdon, D ;
Macpherson, M ;
Bradley, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7259) :486-489
[2]   Barriers to screening sexually active adolescent women for chlamydia: A survey of primary care physicians [J].
Cook, RL ;
Wiesenfeld, HC ;
Ashton, MR ;
Krohn, MA ;
Zamborsky, T ;
Scholle, SH .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2001, 28 (03) :204-210
[3]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, ACT PLAN SEX HLTH ST
[4]   Clinical management of chlamydia in general practice: A survey of reported practice [J].
Griffiths, C ;
Cuddigan, A .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2002, 28 (03) :149-152
[5]   Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: Cross sectional survey [J].
Grun, L ;
TassanoSmith, J ;
Carder, C ;
Johnson, AM ;
Robinson, A ;
Murray, E ;
Stephenson, J ;
Haines, A ;
Copas, A ;
Ridgway, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7102) :226-230
[6]  
Kinn S, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P214
[7]  
MANI R, 2001, MSSVD SPRING M BELF
[8]   Countywide survey of the current practice of chlamydia detection in primary care [J].
Shefras, J ;
Edmondson, S ;
McNulty, C .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2002, 28 (03) :145-148
[9]  
Stokes T, 2000, BRIT J FAM PLAN, V26, P89
[10]   Gps' management of genital chlamydia: a survey of reported practice [J].
Stokes, T ;
Bhaduri, S ;
Schober, P ;
Shukla, R .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1997, 14 (06) :455-460