Outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty and risk factors for graft failure

被引:102
作者
Weisbrod, DJ [1 ]
Sit, M [1 ]
Naor, J [1 ]
Slomovic, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Western Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
penetrating keratoplasty; repeat; regraft; survival; risk factors;
D O I
10.1097/00003226-200307000-00008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with primary PKP with respect to patient characteristics, survival rates, and risk factors for graft failure. Methods. Retrospective, consecutive, noncomparative case series of 116 patients who underwent repeat PKP and who were identified from a cohort of 696 PKPs performed by one surgeon over a 7.5-year period. Results. Compared with patients who underwent primary PKP, regraft patients were 5 years older, had a higher rate of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), were more likely to require intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications prior to surgery, were more likely to develop postoperative corneal neovascularization, were less likely to be phakic, and were more likely to undergo PKP in conjunction with a lens procedure. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to the distribution of original diagnoses leading to PKP and the rate of graft rejection. Two- and 5-year survival rates for repeat PKP were 63.9% and 45.6%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the original diagnosis leading to corneal transplantation, the presence of preoperative PAS, intraoperative anterior vitrectomy, and postoperative corneal neovascularization were identified as risk factors for graft failure in patients undergoing a regraft. Conclusions. Patients undergoing PKP for the first and second time share common risk factors for graft failure, namely, the original diagnosis leading to corneal transplantation, the presence of preoperative PAS, and the occurrence of postoperative corneal neovascularization. The difference in graft survival rates between the two groups can be partially explained on the basis of higher rates of the latter two risk factors among regrafts.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 434
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The profile of repeated corneal transplantation [J].
Bersudsky, V ;
Blum-Hareuveni, T ;
Rehany, U ;
Rumelt, S .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (03) :461-469
[2]   CORNEAL GRAFT-SURVIVAL - A RETROSPECTIVE AUSTRALIAN STUDY [J].
BISHOP, VLM ;
ROBINSON, LP ;
WECHSLER, AW ;
BILLSON, FA .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1986, 14 (02) :133-138
[3]   EFFECT OF FACTORS UNRELATED TO TISSUE MATCHING ON CORNEAL TRANSPLANT ENDOTHELIAL REJECTION [J].
BOISJOLY, HM ;
BERNARD, PM ;
DUBE, I ;
LAUGHREA, PA ;
BAZIN, R ;
BERNIER, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (06) :647-654
[4]  
BOISJOLY HM, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P1728
[5]  
Bradley B A, 1993, Clin Transpl, P293
[6]   PROGNOSIS OF KERATOPLASTY AFTER PREVIOUS GRAFT FAILURES [J].
COWDEN, J ;
KAUFMAN, HE ;
POLACK, FM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1974, 78 (03) :523-525
[7]   Survival analysis and visual outcome in a large series of corneal transplants in India [J].
Dandona, L ;
Naduvilath, TJ ;
Janarthanan, M ;
Ragu, K ;
Rao, GN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 81 (09) :726-731
[8]  
EDERER F, 1973, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V89, P1
[9]  
EPSTEIN RJ, 1987, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V94, P935
[10]  
*EYE BANK ASS AM, CORN TRANSPL REC DIA