Reliability of intratester and intertester measurements derived from an instrumented ankle arthrometer

被引:38
作者
Hubbard, TJ [1 ]
Kovaleski, JE
Kaminski, TW
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Dept Hlth & Phys Educ, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[3] Univ S Alabama, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[4] Univ Delaware, Dept Hlth Nutr & Exercise Sci, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
correlation; mechanical laxity; instrumented measurement; subtalar joint;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.12.3.208
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: Measurement reliability is critical when new sports-medicine devices or techniques are developed. Objective: To determine the reliability of laxity measurements obtained from an instrumented ankle arthrometer. Design: Intratester reliability was examined using a test-retest design, and intertester reliability was assessed using the measurements recorded by 2 different examiners on a separate group of participants. Setting: Sports-medicine research laboratory. Participants: 40 participants with no history of ankle injury, equally divided across the 2 studies. Measurements: Laxity measurements included anteroposterior (AP) displacement during loading to 125 N. Inversion-eversion (I-E) rotation was tested during loading to 4000 N-mm. The measures were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and dependent t tests. Results: Good to excellent ICCs (80-99) for intratester and intertester reliability. A significant difference in measures was observed between testers for both AP displacement and I-E rotation. Conclusions: Laxity measurements from an instrumented ankle arthrometer are reliable across test days and examiners.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 220
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Mechanics of the anterior drawer and talar tilt tests - A cadaveric study of lateral ligament injuries of the ankle [J].
Bahr, R ;
Pena, F ;
Shine, J ;
Lew, WD ;
Lindquist, C ;
Tyrdal, S ;
Engebretsen, L .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 68 (05) :435-441
[2]  
BALDUINI F, 1982, CLIN SPORTS MED, V1, P37
[3]   Ankle ligament injury risk factors:: a prospective study of college athletes [J].
Beynnon, BD ;
Renström, PA ;
Alosa, DM ;
Baumhauer, JF ;
Vacek, PM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (02) :213-220
[4]  
Black H M, 1978, Am J Sports Med, V6, P276, DOI 10.1177/036354657800600510
[5]   THE 3-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS AND FLEXIBILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMAN ANKLE AND SUBTALAR JOINT .2. FLEXIBILITY CHARACTERISTICS [J].
CHEN, J ;
SIEGLER, S ;
SCHNECK, CD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1988, 110 (04) :374-385
[6]   EVALUATION OF ANKLE LIGAMENTOUS INSUFFICIENCY USING THE TELOS ANKLE STRESS APPARATUS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, JC ;
DOCKERY, GL ;
SCHUBERTH, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 76 (09) :527-531
[7]   INSTRUMENTED MEASUREMENT OF ANTERIOR LAXITY OF THE KNEE [J].
DANIEL, DM ;
MALCOM, LL ;
LOSSE, G ;
STONE, ML ;
SACHS, R ;
BURKS, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (05) :720-726
[8]  
Denegar CR, 1993, J SPORT REHABIL, V2, P35, DOI DOI 10.1123/JSR.2.1.35
[9]  
Freeman M A, 1965, J Bone Joint Surg Br, V47, P661
[10]   Is stress radiography necessary in the diagnosis of acute or chronic ankle instability? [J].
Frost, SCL ;
Amendola, A .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 1999, 9 (01) :40-45