Patient selection in an era of donor liver shortage: current US policy

被引:62
作者
Wiesner, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Transplant Ctr, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY | 2005年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
allocation; liver; MELD; PELD; transplant;
D O I
10.1038/ncpgasthep0070
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
In the past, organ allocation in the US was based on anecdotal experience, self-interest and the opinions of single centers, with little support in the way of scientific evidence, mathematical survival modeling or validation. As organ transplantation became more successful, and as disparity between the number of patients on the waiting list and available organs became larger, a more justifiable donor allocation scheme became necessary. The current allocation scheme for donor livers is based on the model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease, which was introduced in 2002 by the United Network for Organ Sharing. This new allocation system has improved accuracy for predicting pretransplant mortality. In addition, the number of liver transplantations has risen for almost all etiologic categories, most noticeably for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Fewer patients have been registered on the liver transplant waiting list and fewer have been removed from the list because they have died or become too sick for transplantation. So far, this new allocation system has been a success, but it does have its shortcomings, and even with improvements to the system, the use of the donor organ pool still needs to be optimized.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, 1999, ORG PROC TRANSPL ASS, P82
  • [2] Feng S, 2003, HEPATOLOGY, V38, p158A
  • [3] Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan
    Freeman, RB
    Wiesner, RH
    Edwards, E
    Harper, A
    Merion, R
    Wolfe, R
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [4] Liver transplant waiting time does not correlate with waiting list mortality: Implications for liver allocation policy
    Freeman, RB
    Edwards, EB
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 6 (05) : 543 - 552
  • [5] Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD
    Freeman, RB
    Wiesner, RH
    Roberts, JP
    McDiarmid, S
    Dykstra, DM
    Merion, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 114 - 131
  • [6] THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [7] *I MED, 1999, COMM ORG TRANSPL ASS, P57
  • [8] A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease
    Kamath, PS
    Wiesner, RH
    Malinchoc, M
    Kremers, W
    Therneau, TM
    Kosberg, CL
    D'Amico, G
    Dickson, ER
    Kim, WR
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (02) : 464 - 470
  • [9] Lucey M R, 1997, Liver Transpl Surg, V3, P628
  • [10] Pediatric transplantation
    Magee, JC
    Bucuvalas, JC
    Farmer, DG
    Harmon, WE
    Hulbert-Shearon, TE
    Mendeloff, EN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 54 - 71