Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers

被引:64
作者
Dvorkin, LS [1 ]
Gladman, MA [1 ]
Epstein, J [1 ]
Scott, SM [1 ]
Williams, NS [1 ]
Lunniss, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal London Hosp, Gastrointestinal Physiol Unit, Ctr Acad Surg, London E1 1BB, England
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4912
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Rectal intussusception is a common finding at evacuation proctography in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Little information exists, however, as to whether intussusception morphology differs between patients with evacuatory dysfunction and healthy volunteers. Methods: Thirty patients (19 women; median age 44 (range 21-76) years) with disordered rectal evacuation, in whom an isolated intussusception was seen on proctography, were studied. Various morphological parameters were measured, and compared with those from 11 asymptomatic controls (six women; median age 30 (range 24-38) years) found, from 31 volunteers, to have rectal intussusception. Intussusceptum thickness greater than 3 nun was designated as full thickness. Intussuscepta. impeding evacuation were deemed to be occluding. Results: Twenty-two patients had full-thickness intussusception, compared with two controls (P = 0.003). Intussusceptum thickness was significantly greater in the symptomatic group (anterior component: P = 0.004; posterior: P = 0.011). Twenty patients in the symptomatic group, but only three subjects in the control group, had a mechanically occluding intussusception (P = 0.043), although only three patients demonstrated evacuatory dynamics outside the normal range. Conclusion: Rectal intussusception in patients with evacuatory dysfunction is more advanced morphologically than that seen in asymptomatic controls; it is predominantly full thickness in patients and mucosal in controls. However, caution is required when selecting patients for intervention based solely on radiological findings.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 872
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   EFFECT OF AGING ON ANORECTAL FUNCTION [J].
BANNISTER, JJ ;
ABOUZEKRY, L ;
READ, NW .
GUT, 1987, 28 (03) :353-357
[2]  
Bremmer S, 1997, ACTA RADIOL, V38, P578
[3]   ANISMUS - THE CAUSE OF CONSTIPATION - RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT [J].
DUTHIE, GS ;
BARTOLO, DCC .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 16 (05) :831-835
[4]   ANAL ENDOSONOGRAPHY IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
ECKARDT, VF ;
JUNG, B ;
FISCHER, B ;
LIERSE, W .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (03) :235-242
[5]   RELATIONSHIP OF SYMPTOMS IN FECAL INCONTINENCE TO SPECIFIC SPHINCTER ABNORMALITIES [J].
ENGEL, AF ;
KAMM, MA ;
BARTRAM, CI ;
NICHOLLS, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1995, 10 (03) :152-155
[6]  
Farouk R, 1998, EUR J SURG, V164, P323
[7]   SENSIBILITY OF RECTUM TO DISTENSION AND ANORECTAL DISTENSION REFLEX IN ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
FARTHING, MJG ;
LENNARDJONES, JE .
GUT, 1978, 19 (01) :64-69
[8]   Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome [J].
Felt-Bersma, RJF ;
Cuesta, MA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 30 (01) :199-+
[9]   EVACUATION PROCTOGRAPHY IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS [J].
FREIMANIS, MG ;
WALD, A ;
CARUANA, B ;
BAUMAN, DH .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (06) :581-585
[10]   ANORECTAL FUNCTION - DEFECOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS [J].
GOEI, R ;
VANENGELSHOVEN, J ;
SCHOUTEN, H ;
BAETEN, C ;
STASSEN, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (01) :137-141