Use of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Laparoscopic Colectomy: How Good Is It and How Can We Improve It?

被引:72
作者
Cologne, Kyle G. [1 ]
Keller, Deborah S. [2 ]
Liwanag, Loriel [1 ]
Devaraj, Bikash [1 ]
Senagore, Anthony J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Colorectal Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Colorectal Surg Associates, Houston, TX USA
[3] Case Med Ctr, Div Colorectal Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; READMISSION RATES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; ADVERSE OUTCOMES; SCORING SYSTEM; OPERATIVE RISK; CR-POSSUM; P-POSSUM; CARE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP risk calculator was developed from multi-institutional clinical data to estimate preoperative risk. The impact of outliers has the potential to greatly affect predictions. Although the effect of outliers is minimized in large series, their impact on the individual provider or institution could be profound. No previous study has assessed the risk calculator for a single institution or provider, including outliers. Our goal was to evaluate the accuracy of the predicted outcomes at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN: Laparoscopic colectomies performed by two colorectal surgeons at a tertiary referral center were prospectively evaluated using the risk calculator. Predicted outcomes were compared with actual outcomes for length of stay (LOS), complications, return to the operating room, and death. Main outcomes measures were differences in actual vs predicted outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients were included. Actual LOS was higher than predicted (mean +/- SD 4.22 +/- 5.49 days vs predicted 4.11 +/- 1.18 days; p = 0.0001). Four outliers with multiple complications had an LOS >3 SDs from the mean. After removing these, observed LOS was significantly shorter than predicted (adjusted LOS mean +/- SD 3.31 +/- 2.30 days vs predicted 4.05 +/- 1.14 days; p = 0.002). Occurrence of any complication was significantly lower than predicted (17.3% vs 19.4%; p = 0.05). Rates of major complications (13.2% vs 19.4%; p = 0.009) and surgical site infections (9.8% vs 11.8%; p = 0.006) were also significantly lower than predicted. There were no significant differences in death, urinary tract infection, renal failure, and reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk calculator was effective for evaluating average surgical-risk patients, it does not accurately predict outcomes in a small percentage of patients when one or more serious complications occur. Addition of surgeon-and patient-specific data via the American College of Surgeons case-logging system could better adjust for these areas. (C) 2015 by the American College of Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 286
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models [J].
Al-Homoud, S ;
Purkayastha, S ;
Aziz, O ;
Smith, JJ ;
Thompson, MD ;
Darzi, AW ;
Stamatakis, JD ;
Tekkis, PP .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2004, 13 (2-3) :83-92
[2]
American College of Surgeons, SURG RISK CALC
[3]
Can Routine Preoperative Data Predict Adverse Outcomes in the Elderly? Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Model Incorporating a Chart-Derived Frailty Score [J].
Amrock, Levana G. ;
Neuman, Mark D. ;
Lin, Hung-Mo ;
Deiner, Stacie .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (04) :684-694
[4]
Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement [J].
Benneyan, JC ;
Lloyd, RC ;
Plsek, PE .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (06) :458-464
[5]
Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aid and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Liu, Yaoming ;
Paruch, Jennifer L. ;
Zhou, Lynn ;
Kmiecik, Thomas E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Cohen, Mark E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) :833-+
[6]
Does surgeon case volume influence nonfatal adverse outcomes after rectal cancer resection? [J].
Billingsley, Kevin G. ;
Morris, Arden M. ;
Green, Pamela ;
Dominitz, Jason A. ;
Matthews, Barbara ;
Dobie, Sharon A. ;
Barlow, William ;
Baldwin, Laura-Mae .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (06) :1167-1177
[7]
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[8]
Validation of the CR-POSSUM risk-adjusted scoring system for major colorectal cancer surgery in a single center [J].
Bromage, Stephen J. ;
Cunliffe, William J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (02) :192-196
[9]
Risk Adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Comparison of Logistic Versus Hierarchical Modeling [J].
Cohen, Mark E. ;
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Richards, Karen ;
Hall, Bruce Lee .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (06) :687-693
[10]
Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: Morbidity and Mortality Risk Calculator for Colorectal Surgery [J].
Cohen, Mark E. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Hall, Bruce Lee .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (06) :1009-1016