Propofol versus midazolam: Safety and efficacy for sedating the severe trauma patient

被引:90
作者
Sanchez-Izquierdo-Riera, JA [1 ]
Caballero-Cubedo, RE [1 ]
Perez-Vela, JL [1 ]
Ambros-Checa, A [1 ]
Cantalapiedra-Santiago, JA [1 ]
Alted-Lopez, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Dept Intens Care Med, Trauma Sect, Madrid 28041, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199806000-00016
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Previous studies have compared sedation profiles with midazolam (Mz) and propofol (Pf), particularly in heterogeneous populations of patients. Decreases in blood pressure and heart rate have been reported after the administration of propofol. These side effects are potentially deleterious in severe trauma patients, particularly in patients with head trauma. To assess the safety and efficacy of Mt and Pf, alone or in combination, in the prolonged sedation of severe trauma patients, we designed a prospective, controlled, randomized, study. One hundred consecutively admitted trauma patients requiring mechanical ventilation and sedation for more than 48 h were studied. Patients were sedated according to three different protocols based on the continuous ni administration of Mt alone, Pf alone, and Mt in combination with Pf. All patients received morphine chloride. Safety and efficacy were assessed during the sedation and wake-up periods according to clinical and laboratory variables. Cerebral hemodynamics were also studied in patients with head trauma. Patients were sedated for 6.3 +/- 4.0 days (mean +/- SD). All three sedation regimens were equally efficacious in achieving the desired sedation goal. The incidence of adverse events during the sedation period was also similar. In head trauma patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, we did not find differences in ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure, or jugular venous oxygen saturation among the three groups. The serum triglyceride concentration was significantly higher in the Pf group. Wake-up time was significantly shorter in the Pf group. We conclude that both Mt and Pf are safe and efficacious in the sedation of severe trauma patients. The use of Pf in these patients is associated with a high incidence of hypertriglyceridemia and a shorter wake-up time. Implications: In a prospective, controlled, randomized study, we confirmed the safety and efficacy of midazolam and propofol, alone or in combination, in the prolonged sedation of a homogeneous group of severe trauma patients, particularly in patients with head trauma. The propofol group had shorter wake-up times and higher triglyceride levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1224
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
AITKENHEAD, AR ;
WILLATTS, SM ;
PARK, GR ;
COLLINS, CH ;
LEDINGHAM, IM ;
PEPPERMAN, ML ;
COATES, PD ;
BODENHAM, AR ;
SMITH, MB ;
WALLACE, PGM .
LANCET, 1989, 2 (8665) :704-709
[2]  
BAKER CC, 1991, TRAUMA, P881
[3]   Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: Impact on weaning and costs [J].
BarrientosVega, R ;
SanchezSoria, MM ;
MoralesGarcia, C ;
RobasGomez, A ;
CuenaBoy, R ;
AyensaRincon, A .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (01) :33-40
[4]   ENERGY-EXPENDITURE AND WITHDRAWAL OF SEDATION IN SEVERE HEAD-INJURED PATIENTS [J].
BRUDER, N ;
LASSEGUE, D ;
PELISSIER, D ;
GRAZIANI, N ;
FRANCOIS, G .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (07) :1114-1119
[5]   ACCUMULATION OF MIDAZOLAM AFTER REPEATED DOSAGE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
BYATT, CM ;
LEWIS, LD ;
DAWLING, S ;
COCHRANE, GM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6448) :799-800
[6]   PROPOFOL VS MIDAZOLAM IN SHORT-TERM, MEDIUM-TERM, AND LONG-TERM SEDATION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
CARRASCO, G ;
MOLINA, R ;
COSTA, J ;
SOLER, JM ;
CABRE, L .
CHEST, 1993, 103 (02) :557-564
[7]   Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial [J].
Chamorro, C ;
deLatorre, FJ ;
Montero, A ;
SanchezIzquierdo, JA ;
Jareno, A ;
Moreno, JA ;
Gonzalez, E ;
Barrios, M ;
Carpintero, JL ;
MartinSantos, F ;
Otero, B ;
Ginestal, R .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06) :932-939
[8]   SOLUBLE CYTOKINE RECEPTORS AND RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS ARE SEQUENTIALLY RELEASED AFTER TRAUMA [J].
CINAT, M ;
WAXMAN, K ;
VAZIRI, ND ;
DAUGHTERS, K ;
YOUSEFI, S ;
SCANNELL, G ;
TOMINAGA, GT .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1995, 39 (01) :112-120
[9]   GASTROINTESTINAL INFECTIONS - EDITORIAL OVERVIEW [J].
COOK, GC .
CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1989, 2 (01) :65-66
[10]  
CRIPPEN DW, 1990, CRIT CARE CLIN, V6, P369