The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China

被引:377
作者
Yin, Jianhua [1 ]
Zheng, Mingzheng [1 ]
Chen, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Business, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Technical progress; CO2 Kuznets curve; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on environmental Kuznets curve theory, a panel data model which takes environmental regulation and technical progress as its moderating factors was developed to analyse the institutional and technical factors that affect the path of low-carbon economic development. The results indicated that there was a CO2 emission Kuznets curve seen in China. Environmental regulation had a significant moderating effect on the curve, and the inflection of CO2 emissions could come substantially earlier under stricter environmental regulation. Meanwhile, the impact of technical progress on the low-carbon economic development path had a longer hysteresis effect but restrained CO2 emission during its increasing stage and accelerated its downward trend during the decreasing stage which was conducive to emission reduction. Strict environmental regulation could force the high-carbon emitting industries to transfer from the eastern regions to the central or the western regions of China, which would make the CO2 Kuznets curve higher in its increasing stage and lower in its decreasing stage than that under looser regulation. Furthermore, energy efficiency, energy structure, and industrial structure exerted a significant direct impact on CO2 emissions; we should consider the above factors as essential in the quest for low-carbon economic development. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 108
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EN J WORLD EC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WORLD EN OUTL 2013
[4]  
[Anonymous], STAT RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Environment and Development Economics, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S1355770X97000211, 10.1017/S1355770X97000211]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EC THEORY BUS MANAG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, DOI DOI 10.1787/CO2_FUEL-2012-EN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Econ. Res. J
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Highlights
[10]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908