Environmental damage schedules: Community judgments of importance and assessments of losses

被引:17
作者
Chuenpagdee, R [1 ]
Knetsch, JL
Brown, TC
机构
[1] Coll William & Mary, Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Econ, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[3] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Ft Collins, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3146976
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Available methods of valuing environmental changes are often limited in their applicability to current issues such as damage assessment and implementing regulatory controls, or may otherwise not provide reliable readings of community, preferences. An alternative is to base decisions on predetermined fixed schedules of sanctions, restrictions. damage awards, and other allocative guides and incentives. which are based on community judgments of the relative importance of different environmental resources and particular changes in their availability and quality. Such schedules can offer advantages of cost savings and consistency over current methods. as demonstrated in the case of Thailand coastal resources.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Simple Rules for a Complex World
[2]  
BINGER BR, 1995, NAT RESOUR J, V35, P443
[3]  
Chansang H., 1994, Phuket Mar. Bio. Cent. Res. Bull., V59, P43
[4]  
CHUENPAGDEE R, UNPUB USING DAMAGE S
[5]  
DAVID HA, 1988, METHOD PAIRED COMPAR
[6]   CLINICAL VERSUS ACTUARIAL JUDGMENT [J].
DAWES, RM ;
FAUST, D ;
MEEHL, PE .
SCIENCE, 1989, 243 (4899) :1668-1674
[7]  
DUNNRANKIN R, 1983, SCALING METHODS
[8]  
Fechner G.T., 1860, Elemente der psychophysik
[9]  
GORTER RB, 1997, 210 S FRAS U SCH RES
[10]   Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages [J].
Kahneman, D ;
Schkade, D ;
Sunstein, CR .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 16 (01) :49-86