Evaluation of etest for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures

被引:28
作者
Chang, HC
Chang, JJ
Chan, SH
Huang, AH
Wu, TL
Lin, MC
Chang, TC
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Technol, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Stat, Inst Med Engn, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Div Clin Microbiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Linko Med Ctr, Dept Clin Pathol, Tainan 701, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.39.4.1328-1333.2001
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The performance of the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures was compared with that of the macrodilution method for determining the MICs of five antifungal agents. Culture broths with blood from bottles positive for yeasts were inoculated directly onto plates for susceptibility testing with the Etest, and the MICs were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation, A total of 141 positive blood cultures (72 cultures of Candida albicans, 31 of Candida tropicalis, 14 of Candida glabrata, 11 of Candida parapsilosis, 3 of Candida krusei, and 3 of Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 miscellaneous yeast species, and 3 mixed cultures) were tested, and the rates of MIC agreement (+/- log(2) dilution) between the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) and macrodilution methods were as follows: amphotericin B, 81.8 and 93.5%; flucytosine, 84.8 and 87.7%; fluconazole, 89.4 and 85.5%; itraconazole, 69.7 and 63.8%; ketoconazole, 87.9 and 79.0%. By a large-sample t test, the difference in log, dilution between the direct Etest and the macrodilution method was found to be small (P < 0.05), The lone exceptions were ketoconazole at 18 h of incubation and itraconazole at both 23 and 48 h of incubation (P > 0,05), By Tukey's multiple comparisons, the difference between the direct Etest (48 h) and reference methods among different species was found to be less than I log, dilution. When the MICs were translated into interpretive susceptibility, the minor errors caused by the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) were as follows: flucytosine, 2.3 and 1.4%: fluconazole, 3.0 and 3.6%; itraconazole, 21.2 and 21.3%. Itraconazole also produced an additional 3.0 and 3.6% major errors as determined by the direct Etest at 24 and 48 h, respectively. It was concluded that, except for itraconazole, the Etest method was feasible for direct susceptibility testing of blood cultures positive for yeasts, The method is simple, and the results could be read between 24 and 48 h after direct inoculation, whenever the inhibition zones were discernible.
引用
收藏
页码:1328 / 1333
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   SECULAR TRENDS IN NOSOCOMIAL PRIMARY BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1980-1989 [J].
BANERJEE, SN ;
EMORI, TG ;
CULVER, DH ;
GAYNES, RP ;
JARVIS, WR ;
HORAN, T ;
EDWARDS, JR ;
TOLSON, J ;
HENDERSON, T ;
MARTONE, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 :S86-S89
[2]  
BECKSAGUE CM, 1993, J INFECT DIS, V167, P1247, DOI 10.1093/infdis/167.5.1247
[3]   Thirteen-year evolution of azole resistance in yeast isolates and prevalence of resistant strains carried by cancer patients at a large medical center [J].
Boschman, CR ;
Bodnar, UR ;
Tornatore, MA ;
Obias, AA ;
Noskin, GA ;
Englund, K ;
Postelnick, MA ;
Suriano, T ;
Peterson, LR .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (04) :734-738
[4]   Evaluation of a capacitance method for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures [J].
Chang, HC ;
Chang, JJ ;
Huang, AH ;
Chang, TC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (03) :971-976
[5]  
Chen YC, 1997, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V18, P369, DOI 10.1086/647628
[6]   COMPARISON OF E-TEST AND NATIONAL-COMMITTEE-FOR-CLINICAL-LABORATORY-STANDARDS BROTH MACRODILUTION METHOD FOR AZOLE ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING [J].
COLOMBO, AL ;
BARCHIESI, F ;
MCGOUGH, DA ;
RINALDI, MG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (03) :535-540
[7]   Comparison of a new commercial colorimetric microdilution method with a standard method for in-vitro susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and Clyptococcus neoformans [J].
Davey, KG ;
Szekely, A ;
Johnson, EM ;
Warnock, DW .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (04) :439-444
[8]   EVALUATION OF A DIRECT BLOOD CULTURE DISK DIFFUSION ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST [J].
DOERN, GV ;
SCOTT, DR ;
RASHAD, AL ;
KIM, KS .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1981, 20 (05) :696-698
[9]   CLINICAL IMPACT OF RAPID ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF BLOOD CULTURE ISOLATES [J].
DOERN, GV ;
SCOTT, DR ;
RASHAD, AL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1982, 21 (06) :1023-1024
[10]   COLLABORATIVE COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS [J].
ESPINELINGROFF, A ;
KISH, CW ;
KERKERING, TM ;
FROMTLING, RA ;
BARTIZAL, K ;
GALGIANI, JN ;
VILLAREAL, K ;
PFALLER, MA ;
GERARDEN, T ;
RINALDI, MG ;
FOTHERGILL, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (12) :3138-3145