Pragmatics and word meaning

被引:41
作者
Lascarides, A
Copestake, A
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Cognit Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, HCRC, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Study Language & Informat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0022226798007087
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore the interaction between lexical semantics and pragmatics. We argue that linguistic processing is informationally encapsulated and utilizes relatively simple 'taxonomic' lexical semantic knowledge. On this basis, defeasible lexical generalisations deliver defeasible parts of logical form. In contrast, pragmatic inference is open-ended and involves arbitrary real-world knowledge. Two axioms specify when pragmatic defaults override lexical ones. We demonstrate that modelling this interaction allows us to achieve a more refined interpretation of words in a discourse context than either the lexicon or pragmatics could do on their own.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 414
页数:28
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INHERITANCE DEFAULTS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 499 SRI INT ART INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 6 C EUR CHAPT ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, P 12 INT JOINT C ART
[5]  
Asher Nicholas, 1995, Journal of Semantics, V12, P69, DOI DOI 10.1093/J0S/12.1.69
[6]  
Asher Nicholas, 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse
[7]  
Bauer Laurie., 1983, ENGLISH WORD FORMATI
[8]  
BRISCOE E, 1990, P 13 INT C COMP LING, P42
[9]  
COPESTAKE A, 1992, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V627, P101
[10]  
COPESTAKE A, 1992, THESIS U SUSSEX