Responses of plankton and fish communities to mass removal of planktivorous fish in a two-basin lake in southern Finland

被引:7
作者
Rask, M [1 ]
Olin, M
Keskitalo, J
Lehtovaara, A
Ruuhijärvi, J
Vesala, S
机构
[1] Finnish Game & Fisheries Res Inst, Evo Fisheries Res Stn, FIN-16970 Evo, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Lammi Biol Stn, FIN-16900 Lammi, Finland
关键词
eutrophication; lake restoration; blue-green algae; phytoplankton; crustacean zooplankton; fish community;
D O I
10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008546.14629.11
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Responses of plankton and fish communities to mass removal of cyprinid fishes were studied in a two-basin lake, Aimajarvi, in southern Finland during 1997-2001. Fish were removed from the lake with fyke nets and seining. By spring 2001, the cumulative catches were 276 kg ha(-1) in the northern and 226 kg ha(-1) in the southern basin. Roach dominated the catches of both basins. From summer 1997 to 2001 the total biomass of phytoplankton decreased from 10-30 to 5-13 mg l(-1) in the more eutrophic northern basin and from 5-19 to 2-4 mg l(-1) in the southern basin, respectively. The occurrence of maximum biomass of blue-green algae moved from July to August towards autumn during the study period. The mean biomass of cladoceran crustaceans in July to August showed a slightly increasing trend from 100-150 to 150-200 mug C l(-1). The biomasses of Daphnia spp. and Bosmina coregoni were higher in 2000 and 2001 compared to earlier years. The annual mean total catches of multimesh gillnets, dominated by roach, were 3.9-5.1 kg net(-1) in the northern and 1.8-2.6 kg net(-1) in the southern basin. A slight decrease took place in the gillnet catches in the southern basin but not in the northern. The increased growth of young perch and roach in the last years of the study period was attributed to the thermal conditions rather than to the fish removal.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 457
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Bagenal T.B., 1978, METHODS ASSESSEMENT, P101
[2]   Top-down or bottom-up effects by fish: Issues of concern in biomanipulation of lakes [J].
Horppila, J ;
Peltonen, H ;
Malinen, T ;
Luokkanen, E ;
Kairesalo, T .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 1998, 6 (01) :20-28
[3]  
Järvinen M, 1998, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V55, P2562, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-55-12-2562
[4]   An indirect estimate of bimodal gillnet selectivity of smelt [J].
Kurkilahti, M ;
Appelberg, M ;
Bergstrand, E ;
Enderlein, O .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) :243-254
[5]  
Luokkanen E., 1995, HELSINGIN YLIOPISTON, V25, P1
[6]  
Mannio J, 2000, INT VER THEOR ANGEW, V27, P362
[7]   Biomanipulation in shallow lakes in The Netherlands: an evaluation of 18 case studies [J].
Meijer, ML ;
de Boois, I ;
Scheffer, M ;
Portielje, R ;
Hosper, H .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1999, 408 (0) :13-30
[8]  
Sammalkorpi I., 2000, VERH INT VEREIN LIMN, V27, P1464
[9]  
Sarvala J., 2000, VERH INT VER THEOR A, V27, P1473
[10]  
Shapiro J, 1975, BIOMANIPULATION ECOS