Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology

被引:439
作者
Giribet, G
Edgecombe, GD
Wheeler, WC
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolut Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[3] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Div Invertebrate Zool, New York, NY 10024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/35093097
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The interrelationships of major clades within the Arthropoda remain one of the most contentious issues in systematics, which has traditionally been the domain of morphologists(1,2). A growing body of DNA sequences and other types of molecular data has revitalized study of arthropod phylogeny(3-7) and has inspired new considerations of character evolution(8,9). Novel hypotheses such as a crustacean-hexapod affinity(4,10-12) were based on analyses of single or few genes and limited taxon sampling, but have received recent support from mitochondrial gene order(13), and eye and brain ultrastructure and neurogenesis(14,15). Here we assess relationships within Arthropoda based on a synthesis of all well sampled molecular loci together with a comprehensive data set of morphological, developmental, ultrastructural and gene-order characters. The molecular data include sequences of three nuclear ribosomal genes, three nuclear protein-coding genes, and two mitochondrial genes (one protein coding, one ribosomal). We devised new optimization procedures(16,17) and constructed a parallel computer cluster with 256 central processing units(18) to analyse molecular data on a scale not previously possible. The optimal 'total evidence' cladogram supports the crustacean-hexapod clade, recognizes pycnogonids as sister to other euarthropods, and indicates monophyly of Myriapoda and Mandibulata.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 161
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans
    Boore, JL
    Lavrov, DV
    Brown, WM
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 392 (6677) : 667 - 668
  • [2] BREMER K, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P795, DOI [10.2307/2408870, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x]
  • [3] Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution
    Colgan, DJ
    McLauchlan, A
    Wilson, GDF
    Livingston, SP
    Edgecombe, GD
    Macaranas, J
    Cassis, G
    Gray, MR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1998, 46 (05) : 419 - 437
  • [4] Dohle W, 2001, ANN SOC ENTOMOL FR, V37, P85
  • [5] Edgecombe GD, 2000, CLADISTICS, V16, P155, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00352.x
  • [6] Constructing a significance test for incongruence
    Farris, JS
    Kallersjo, M
    Kluge, AG
    Bult, C
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1995, 44 (04) : 570 - 572
  • [7] RIBOSOMAL DNA PHYLOGENY OF THE MAJOR EXTANT ARTHROPOD CLASSES AND THE EVOLUTION OF MYRIAPODS
    FRIEDRICH, M
    TAUTZ, D
    [J]. NATURE, 1995, 376 (6536) : 165 - 167
  • [8] Homegrown computer roots out phylogenetic networks
    Gee, H
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 404 (6775) : 214 - 214
  • [9] Giribet G, 2000, CLADISTICS, V16, P204, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00353.x
  • [10] First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada plus arthropoda clade
    Giribet, G
    Carranza, S
    Baguna, J
    Riutort, M
    Ribera, C
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1996, 13 (01) : 76 - 84