Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification

被引:499
作者
Collewet, G [1 ]
Strzelecki, M
Mariette, F
机构
[1] Irstea, Rennes, France
[2] Tech Univ Lodz, Inst Elect, PL-90924 Lodz, Poland
关键词
texture analysis; classification; gray level normalization;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2003.09.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Texture analysis methods quantify the spatial variations in gray level values within an image and thus can provide useful information on the structures observed. However, they are sensitive to acquisition conditions due to the use of different protocols and to intra- and interscanner variations in the case of MRI. The influence was studied of two protocols and four different conditions of normalization of gray levels on the discrimination power of texture analysis methods applied to soft cheeses. Thirty-two samples of soft cheese were chosen at two different ripening periods (16 young and 16 old samples) in order to obtain two different microscopic structures of the protein gel. Proton density and T-2-weighted MR images were acquired using a spin echo sequence on a 0.2 T scanner. Gray levels were normalized according to four methods: original gray levels, same maximum for all images, same mean for all images, and dynamics limited to mu +/- 3sigma. Regions of interest were automatically defined, and texture descriptors were then computed for the co-occurrence matrix, run length matrix. gradient matrix, autoregressive model, and wavelet transform. The features with the lowest probability of error and average correlation coefficient were selected and used for classification with 1-nearest neighbor (1-NN) classifier. The best results were obtained when using the limitation of dynamics to mu +/- 3sigma, which enhanced the differences between the two classes. The results demonstrated the influence of the normalization method and of the acquisition protocol on the effectiveness of the classification and also on the parameters selected for classification. These results indicate the need to evaluate sensitivity to MR acquisition protocols and to gray level normalization methods when texture analysis is required. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 91
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
CHALAND B, 1999, THESIS U RENNES
[2]
MRI SEGMENTATION - METHODS AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CLARKE, LP ;
VELTHUIZEN, RP ;
CAMACHO, MA ;
HEINE, JJ ;
VAIDYANATHAN, M ;
HALL, LO ;
THATCHER, RW ;
SILBIGER, ML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (03) :343-368
[3]
COLLEWET G, 2002, MAGN RESON MAT BIOL, V15, P234
[4]
Dash M., 1997, Intelligent Data Analysis, V1
[5]
USING CANNY CRITERIA TO DERIVE A RECURSIVELY IMPLEMENTED OPTIMAL EDGE DETECTOR [J].
DERICHE, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 1987, 1 (02) :167-187
[6]
Eliat PA, 2001, ANTICANCER RES, V21, P3857
[7]
Galloway MM., 1975, COMPUTER GRAPHICS IM, V4, P172, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0146-664X(75)80008-6
[8]
STATISTICAL AND STRUCTURAL APPROACHES TO TEXTURE [J].
HARALICK, RM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1979, 67 (05) :786-804
[9]
TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION [J].
HARALICK, RM ;
SHANMUGAM, K ;
DINSTEIN, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06) :610-621
[10]
Comparison of automated and visual texture analysis in MRI: Characterization of normal and diseased skeletal muscle [J].
Herlidou, S ;
Rolland, Y ;
Bansard, JY ;
Le Rumeur, E ;
de Certaines, JD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (09) :1393-1397