Constructing nature: Laboratory models as necessary tools for investigating complex ecological communities

被引:43
作者
Cadotte, MW [1 ]
Drake, JA
Fukami, T
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Landcare Res, Lincoln, New Zealand
来源
ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 37: POPULATION DYNAMICS AND LABORATORY ECOLOGY | 2005年 / 37卷
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0065-2504(04)37011-X
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological systems are arguably among the most complex of all systems found in nature at any scale of observation. The origin of this complexity arises not only from the stunning diversity of entities that comprise such systems (i.e., species, individuals and highly variable nature of interactions among these entities), but also because such systems exhibit nonequilibrium, non-linear, historically contingent, self-organizing behavior replete with a host of emergent properties and attendant noise. There are few constants or laws past thermodynamic constraints and simple mechanics, and here process and mechanism operate across vast scales of existence in a fashion that is not precisely replicable. The basic approach of ecologists has been brute-force observation and experimentation in specific settings, with the tacit hope that answers will emerge from large data collection. Laboratory experiments, of course, suffer from many of the same difficulties that plague field studies. At the same time, the simplifying assumptions of laboratory community studies permit explorations of intact communities-something never accomplished in the field (Drake et al., 1996). But the lab is not enough. The general dynamic behaviors and phenomena observed in the lab provide fodder (in the form of potential and probable processes directing community structure) for field approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 353
页数:21
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species [J].
Amarasekare, P ;
Nisbet, RM .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2001, 158 (06) :572-584
[2]   Empirical evidence for predator-prey source-sink dynamics [J].
Amezcua, AB ;
Holyoak, M .
ECOLOGY, 2000, 81 (11) :3087-3098
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Science Wars
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1880, ATTI REALE ACCADEMIA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, BEGINNINGS W SCI
[6]   EFFECTS OF BASAL RESOURCES, PREDATION, AND ALTERNATIVE PREY IN MICROCOSM FOOD-CHAINS [J].
BALCIUNAS, D ;
LAWLER, SP .
ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (04) :1327-1336
[7]  
Berlow EL, 1997, ECOL MONOGR, V67, P435, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0435:FCTCHE]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
Bohannan BJM, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P2303
[10]   Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms [J].
Buckling, A ;
Kassen, R ;
Bell, G ;
Rainey, PB .
NATURE, 2000, 408 (6815) :961-964