Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring:: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages

被引:114
作者
Szelenyi, Andrea [1 ]
Kothbauer, Karl F.
Deletis, Vedran
机构
[1] Univ Frankfurt Klinikum, Dept Neurosurg, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Kantonsspital Luzern, Dept Neurosurg, Luzern, Switzerland
[3] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Inst Neurol & Neurosurg, Div Intraoperat Neurophysiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
intraoperative motor evoked potential; reference values; stimulating electrode montage; stimulation parameters; motor threshold; transcranial electric stimulation; total intravenous anesthesia;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of constant current transcranial electric stimulation (TES) parameters for eliciting muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the abductor pollicis brevis muscles (APB) and the tibialis anterior muscles (TA). The following parameters were tested intraoperatively: interstimulus interval (ISI), individual stimulation pulse duration within a train of five stimuli. Different montages of stimulating electrodes were assessed for effectiveness and focality. Further, reference values for APB and TA motor thresholds in neurosurgical patients with normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia were determined. Methods: Motor thresholds of contralateral muscle MEPs were determined at 0.1, 0. 2, 0.4, and 0. 5 ms pulse duration and ISIs of 2, 3, 4, and 5 ms using a train of five monophasic constant current pulses with C3/C4 (27 patients). The stimulating electrodes were positioned at Cl, C2, C3, C4, Cz, and Cz+6 cm. Different montages were used to determine the most effective and the most focal stimulation montages for the APB and TA muscles (30 patients). Eighty-six patients with clinically normal motor function were studied for motor threshold reference values. Results: The prolongation of the pulse duration has the strongest effect to decrease the motor threshold, which proportionally increases the delivered charge. The lowest stimulation threshold to elicit muscle MEPs in the APB and TA muscles is achieved with a train of stimuli consisting of an individual stimulus pulse duration of 0.5 ms. An ISI of 4 ms gave the lowest motor thresholds, but did not reach statistical significance compared to 3 ms. The stimulating electrode montage C3/C4 (C4/C3) allows for the lowest stimulation thresholds, but the vigorous muscle contractions it has is a disadvantage. The most focal stimulating electrode montages for the contralateral APB muscles are C3/Cz and C4/Cz, respectively, and for the TA muscles Cz/Cz+6 cm. Conclusions: In adult neurosurgical patients with a normal motor status under total intravenous anesthesia, an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor thresholds. Pragmatically, C1/C2, resp., C2/C I montage provides monitorable responses in both APB and TA muscles at reasonable stimulation thresholds without inducing movements disturbing surgery and especially microdissection. If the most focal hemispheric stimulation for the distal upper extremity muscles is required, the use of C3 or C4 referenced to Cz is recommended. Significance: The stimulation parameters within a train of five pulses with an individual pulse duration of 0.5 ms and an ISI of 4 ms provide the lowest motor threshold. These data confirm not only studies for D wave recovery but also provide optimal stimulation parameters for intraoperative near threshold stimulation. (c) 2007 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1586 / 1595
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Agnew W F, 1975, Surg Neurol, V4, P438
[2]
Transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation compared: Does TES activate intracortical neuronal circuits? [J].
Brocke, J ;
Irlbacher, K ;
Hauptmann, B ;
Voss, M ;
Brandt, SA .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (12) :2748-2756
[3]
BURKE D, 1992, BRAIN, V115, P1497
[4]
CORTICOSPINAL VOLLEYS EVOKED BY ANODAL AND CATHODAL STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, RG ;
STEPHEN, JPH .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1990, 425 :283-299
[5]
ASSESSMENT OF CORTICOSPINAL AND SOMATOSENSORY CONDUCTION SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING SCOLIOSIS SURGERY [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, R ;
STEPHEN, J ;
WOODFORTH, I ;
CRAWFORD, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (06) :388-396
[6]
Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Broton, JG ;
Alexeeva, N ;
Green, BA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 88 (03) :457-470
[7]
NONINVASIVE MAPPING OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX [J].
COHEN, LG ;
HALLETT, M .
NEUROLOGY, 1988, 38 (06) :904-909
[8]
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 2. Relationship between epidurally and muscle recorded MEPs in man [J].
Deletis, V ;
Rodi, Z ;
Amassian, VE .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :445-452
[9]
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli [J].
Deletis, V ;
Isgum, V ;
Amassian, VE .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :438-444
[10]
Deletis V., 2004, CURR OPIN ORTHOP, V15, P154, DOI [DOI 10.1097/01.bco.0000127314.99341.ad, 10.1097/01.bco.0000127314.99341.ad]