In search of the missing middle

被引:31
作者
Ravenhill, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Int Relat, Res Sch Pacific & Asian Studies, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
IPE; methodology; ontology; rational choice; critical approaches;
D O I
10.1080/09692290701751258
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a recent article in RIPE, Benjamin J. Cohen suggests that a deep divide exists between two schools of IPE: the American and the British. While, at a certain level of generality, obvious differences do exist between how international relations generally, and IPE more specifically, are studied in the US and the UK, various dimensions of Cohen's argument are problematic, and may inadvertently hinder his professed desire to build bridges across the Atlantic. In particular, Cohen's approach is ambiguous as to exactly what the defining characteristics of the 'British' approach are, appears to conflate different traditions of theorizing, and presents a very narrow characterization of the field of IPE in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 29
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Aggarwal V.K., 1985, LIBERAL PROTECTIONIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, The New International Political Economy
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, POLITICAL SCI STATE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, INT THEORY POSITIVIS
[5]  
Axelrod R., 1984, The evolution of cooperation
[6]  
BROWN C, 2001, CRITICAL THEORY WORL
[7]  
Cammack Paul, 2007, PAPERS POLITICS GLOB
[8]   The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different? [J].
Cohen, Benjamin J. .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2007, 14 (02) :197-219
[9]  
COHEN BJ, UNPUB BUILDING BRIDG
[10]  
Cox R., 1996, Approaches to World Order