A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches

被引:462
作者
Bramer, Wichor M. [1 ]
de Jonge, Gerdien B. [1 ]
Rethlefsen, Melissa L. [2 ]
Mast, Frans [1 ]
Kleijnen, Jos [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Med Lib, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utah, Spencer S Eccles Hlth Sci Lib, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Kleijnen Systemat Reviews, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
GOOGLE SCHOLAR; REVIEWS; QUESTION; RECALL; SPIDER; PICO;
D O I
10.5195/jmla.2018.283
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
050302 [传播学]; 071101 [系统理论];
摘要
Creating search strategies for systematic reviews, finding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity, and translating search strategies between databases is challenging. Several methods describe standards for systematic search strategies, but a consistent approach for creating an exhaustive search strategy has not yet been fully described in enough detail to be fully replicable. The authors have established a method that describes step by step the process of developing a systematic search strategy as needed in the systematic review. This method describes how single-line search strategies can be prepared in a text document by typing search syntax (such as field codes, parentheses, and Boolean operators) before copying and pasting search terms (keywords and free-text synonyms) that are found in the thesaurus. To help ensure term completeness, we developed a novel optimization technique that is mainly based on comparing the results retrieved by thesaurus terms with those retrieved by the free-text search words to identify potentially relevant candidate search terms. Macros in Microsoft Word have been developed to convert syntaxes between databases and interfaces almost automatically. This method helps information specialists in developing librarian-mediated searches for systematic reviews as well as medical and health care practitioners who are searching for evidence to answer clinical questions. The described method can be used to create complex and comprehensive search strategies for different databases and interfaces, such as those that are needed when searching for relevant references for systematic reviews, and will assist both information specialists and practitioners when they are searching the biomedical literature.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 541
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods [J].
Anderson, Laurie M. ;
Oliver, Sandy R. ;
Michie, Susan ;
Rehfuess, Eva ;
Noyes, Jane ;
Shemilt, Ian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) :1223-1229
[2]
[Anonymous], MLA NEWS
[3]
[Anonymous], 2013, COCHRANE UNIT
[4]
Bramer W.M., 2015, MLA News, V55, P6
[5]
Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: A prospective study [J].
Bramer W.M. ;
Giustini D. ;
Kramer B.M.R. .
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
[6]
The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. [J].
Bramer W.M. ;
Giustini D. ;
Kramer B.M. ;
Anderson P. .
Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) :115
[7]
Bramer WM, 2017, PRAGMATIC EVALUATION
[8]
Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis [J].
Cooke, Alison ;
Smith, Debbie ;
Booth, Andrew .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) :1435-1443
[9]
Eden J, 2011, FINDING WHAT WORKS IN HEALTH CARE: STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, P1
[10]
Elsevier R& D Solutions, 2015, COMP EMTR MESH