CT scan in patients with suspected appendicitis: Clinical implications for the acute care surgeon

被引:28
作者
Petrosyan, M. [1 ,2 ]
Estrada, J. [1 ,2 ]
Chan, S. [1 ,2 ]
Somers, S. [1 ,2 ]
Yacoub, W. N. [1 ,2 ]
Kelso, R. L. [1 ,2 ]
Mason, R. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Los Angeles Cty USC Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
alvarado score; acute appendicitis; appendicitis; CT scan; appendicitis diagnosis;
D O I
10.1159/000110863
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine the influence of computed tomography (CT) scans on diagnosis and management of patients with suspected appendicitis. Methods: Retrospective 2-year review of 1,630 patients with suspected appendicitis, categorized into three groups based on the likelihood (Alvarado scores) of having appendicitis. Group 1: low likelihood (Alvarado score <= 4); group 2: intermediate likelihood (Alvarado scores 5-7), and group 3: high likelihood (Alvarado score >= 8). CT scan utilization, hospital course, and final pathology were retrospectively reviewed. Results: More patients received a CT scan in 2006 as compared with 2005 (60 vs. 52%; p = 0.001). The overall appendectomy rate was similar between the 2 years (57% in 2005 vs. 57% in 2006; p = 0.995). The overall appendectomy rate in patients with a CT was significantly higher as compared with those without (60 vs. 53%; p = 0.002). The appendectomy rate in patients with Alvarado scores <= 4 and no CT scan was significantly lower than in those with a CT scan (12 vs. 48%; p ! 0.0001). The overall negative appendectomy rate in patients with a CT scan was similar to that in those without: 31/546 (6%) vs. 23/383 (6%). Conclusions: CT scan utilization increased the appendectomy rate only in patients with a low clinical suspicion for appendicitis. Preoperative CT scans did not decrease the negative appendectomy rate. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
    ALVARADO, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) : 557 - 564
  • [2] AMLAND PF, 1989, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V155, P185
  • [3] INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION IN SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS AND INCIDENCE OF PERFORATION
    ANDERSSON, R
    HUGANDER, A
    THULIN, A
    NYSTROM, PO
    OLAISON, G
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6921) : 107 - 110
  • [4] The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: Spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis
    Andersson, Roland E.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [5] Balthazar EJ, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P768
  • [6] ACUTE APPENDICITIS - CT AND US CORRELATION IN 100 PATIENTS
    BALTHAZAR, EJ
    BIRNBAUM, BA
    YEE, J
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    ROSHKOW, J
    GRAY, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [7] Imaging for suspected appendicitis: Negative appendectomy and perforation rates
    Bendeck, SE
    Nino-Murcia, M
    Berry, GJ
    Jeffrey, RB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) : 131 - 136
  • [8] Acute appendicitis - A clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women
    Borgstein, PJ
    Gordijn, RV
    Eijsbouts, QAJ
    Cuesta, MA
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (09): : 923 - 927
  • [9] Brandt MM, 2003, AM SURGEON, V69, P727
  • [10] Cakirer Sinan, 2002, Emerg Radiol, V9, P155