The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma

被引:92
作者
Özsarlak, Ö
Tjalma, W
Schepens, E
Corthouts, B
de Beeck, BO
Van Marck, E
Parizel, PM
De Schepper, AM
机构
[1] Univ Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dept Radiol, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[2] Univ Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dept Gynecol Oncol, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[3] Univ Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dept Pathol, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
关键词
cervical cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; computed tomography; staging; FIGO system;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-003-1928-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative findings of abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI with the preoperative clinical International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging and postoperative pathology report in patients with primary cancer of the cervix. Thirty-six patients with surgical-pathological proven primary cancer of the cervix were retrospectively studied for preoperative staging by clinical examination, CT, and MR imaging. Studied parameters for preoperative staging were the presence of tumor, tumor extension into the parametrial tissue, pelvic wall, adjacent organs, and lymph nodes. The CT was performed in 32 patients and MRI (T1- and T2-weighted images) in 29 patients. The CT and MR staging were based on the FIGO staging system. Results were compared with histological findings. The group is consisted of stage 0 (in situ):1, Ia:1, Ib:8, IIa:2, IIb:12, IIIa:4, IVa:6, and IVb:2 patients. The overall accuracy of staging for clinical examination, CT, and MRI was 47, 53, and 86%, respectively. The MRI incorrectly staged 2 patients and did not visualize only two tumors; one was an in situ (stage-0) and one stage-Ia (microscopic) disease. The MRI is more accurate than CT and they are both superior to clinical examination in evaluating the locoregional extension and preoperative staging of primary cancer of the cervix.
引用
收藏
页码:2338 / 2345
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Benedet JL, 2000, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V70, P209
[2]   The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma [J].
Boss, EA ;
Barentsz, JO ;
Massuger, LFAG ;
Boonstra, H .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) :256-270
[3]   NEW GYNECOLOGIC CANCER STAGING [J].
CREASMAN, WT .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 58 (02) :157-158
[5]   Early invasive carcinoma of the cervix (3 to 5 mm invasion): Risk factors and prognosis - A Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Creasman, WT ;
Zaino, RJ ;
Major, FJ ;
DiSaia, PJ ;
Hatch, KD ;
Homesley, HD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (01) :62-65
[6]   PROSPECTIVE SURGICAL PATHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF DISEASE-FREE INTERVAL IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE IB SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY [J].
DELGADO, G ;
BUNDY, B ;
ZAINO, R ;
SEVIN, BU ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
MAJOR, F .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (03) :352-357
[7]   High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neoplasia with a dedicated transvaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings [J].
deSouza, NM ;
Scoones, D ;
Krausz, T ;
Gilderdale, DJ ;
Soutter, WP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (03) :553-559
[8]   Negative MRI findings with invasive cervical biopsy may indicate stage IA cervical carcinoma [J].
Fujiwara, K ;
Yoden, E ;
Asakawa, T ;
Shimizu, M ;
Hirokawa, M ;
Mikami, Y ;
Oda, T ;
Joja, I ;
Imajo, Y ;
Kohno, I .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 79 (03) :451-456
[9]  
Hamm B, 1999, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V170, P327
[10]  
Hawighorst H, 1997, RADIOLOGE, V37, P130, DOI 10.1007/s001170050185