Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps

被引:255
作者
Johnson, CD
Harmsen, WS
Wilson, LA
MacCarty, RL
Welch, TJ
Ilstrup, DM
Ahlquist, DA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Rochester, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Rochester, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin Rochester, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00894-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: This study used a low lesion prevalence population reflective of the screening setting to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps. Methods: This prospective, blinded study comprised 703 asymptomatic persons at higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer who underwent CT colonography followed by same-day colonoscopy. Two of 3 experienced readers interpreted each CT colonography examination. Results: Overall lesion prevalence for adenomas greater than or equal to1 cm in diameter was 5%. Seventy percent of all lesions were proximal to the descending colon. With colonoscopy serving as the gold standard, CT colonography detected 34%, 32%, 73%, and 63% of the 59 polyps greater than or equal to1 cm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively; and 35%, 29%, 57%, and 54% of the 94 polyps 5-9 mm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively. Specificity for CT colonography ranged from 95% to 98% and 86% to 95% for >1 cm and 5-9-mm polyps, respectively. Interobserver variability was high for CT colonography with K statistic values ranging from -0.67 to 0.89. Conclusions: In a low prevalence setting, polyp detection rates at CT colonography are well below those at colonoscopy. These rates are less than previous reports based largely on high lesion prevalence cohorts. High interobserver variability warrants further investigation but may be due to the low prevalence of polyps in this cohort and the high impact on total sensitivity of each missed polyp. Specificity, based on large numbers, is high and exhibits excellent agreement among observers.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 319
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] American Cancer Society, 2002, CANC FACTS FIG 2002
  • [2] HAS THE USE OF CERVICAL, BREAST, AND COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING INCREASED IN THE UNITED-STATES
    ANDERSON, LM
    MAY, DS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (06) : 840 - 842
  • [3] ACCURACY OF ASSESSMENT OF THE EXTENT OF EXAMINATION BY EXPERIENCED COLONOSCOPISTS
    ANDERSON, ML
    HEIGH, RI
    MCCOY, GA
    PARENT, K
    MUHM, JR
    MCKEE, GS
    EVERSMAN, WG
    COLLINS, JM
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1992, 38 (05) : 560 - 563
  • [4] [Anonymous], ACQUISITION SKILL
  • [5] Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists - Findings from a national sample
    Beam, CA
    Layde, PM
    Sullivan, DC
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (02) : 209 - 213
  • [6] THE KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF SCREENING-TESTS FOR COLORECTAL AND PROSTATE-CANCER - DATA FROM THE 1987 NATIONAL-HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY
    BROWN, ML
    POTOSKY, AL
    THOMPSON, GB
    KESSLER, LG
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (05) : 562 - 574
  • [7] Colon cancer screening
    Burt, RW
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 119 (03) : 837 - 853
  • [8] CT colonography without cathartic preparation: Feasibility study
    Callstrom, MR
    Johnson, CD
    Fletcher, JG
    Reed, JE
    Ahlquist, DA
    Harmsen, WS
    Tait, K
    Wilson, LA
    Corcoran, KE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) : 693 - 698
  • [9] OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF ENDOSCOPY SKILLS DURING TRAINING
    CASS, OW
    FREEMAN, ML
    PEINE, CJ
    ZERA, RT
    ONSTAD, GR
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [10] CT colonography: Value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions
    Chen, SC
    Lu, DSK
    Hecht, JR
    Kadell, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (03) : 595 - 599