Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures

被引:90
作者
Eadie, TL [1 ]
Doyle, TC
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, Voice Prod & Percept Lab, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Otolaryngol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
auditory-perceptual scaling; acoustic measures of voice; acoustic prediction; pathological voice quality; connected speech;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was (1) to determine the relationship between acoustic measures and auditory-perceptual dimensions of overall voice severity and pleasantness and (2) to evaluate the ability of acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures to discriminate normal from dysphonic voices. Thirty adult dysphonic speakers and six, age-matched normal control speakers were asked to provide oral reading samples of the Rainbow Passage. Acoustic analysis of the speech samples was used to identify abnormal phonatory events associated with dysphonia. The acoustic program calculated long-term average spectral measures, glottal noise measures, and those measures based on linear prediction (LP) modeling. Twelve adult listeners judged overall voice severity and pleasantness from the connected speech samples using direct magnitude estimation (DME) procedures. The acoustic measures accounted for 48% of overall voice severity and 40% of voice pleasantness for dysphonic speakers. The classification performance of the acoustic measures and auditory-perceptual measures was quantified using logistic regression analysis. When acoustic measures or auditory-perceptual measures were considered in isolation, classification was generally accurate and similar across measures. Classification accuracy improved to 100% when acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures were combined. These data provide further support for use of both auditory-perceptual evaluation and acoustic analyses for classifying and evaluating dysphonia.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
*AV INN INC, 1998, INT VOIC AN SYST INV
[2]   Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement [J].
Bielamowicz, S ;
Kreiman, J ;
Gerratt, BR ;
Dauer, MS ;
Berke, GS .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (01) :126-134
[3]   Self-organizing map for the classification of normal and disordered female voices [J].
Callan, DE ;
Kent, RD ;
Roy, N ;
Tasko, SM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1999, 42 (02) :355-366
[4]  
Davis SB, 1979, Speech and Language, V1, P271, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-608601-0.50010-3
[5]   Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality [J].
DeBodt, MS ;
Wuyts, FL ;
VandeHeyning, PH ;
Croux, C .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1997, 11 (01) :74-80
[6]   SOME SPECTRAL CORRELATES OF PATHOLOGICAL BREATHY AND ROUGH VOICE QUALITY FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF VOWEL FRAGMENTS [J].
DEKROM, G .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 38 (04) :794-811
[7]   TAPE-RECORDER EFFECTS ON JITTER AND SHIMMER EXTRACTION [J].
DOHERTY, ET ;
SHIPP, T .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 31 (03) :485-490
[8]  
DOYLE PC, 1995, J MED SPEECH-LANG PA, V3, P131
[9]   Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers [J].
Eadie, TL ;
Doyle, PC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 112 (06) :3014-3021
[10]  
ESKANAZI L, 1990, J SPEECH HEAR RES, V33, P298