The debate on most ideal technique for managing recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a short review

被引:18
作者
Onyia, Chiazor U. [1 ]
Menon, Sajesh K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, Teaching Hosp Complex, Dept Surg, Neurosurg Div, Ife, Nigeria
[2] Amrita Univ, Amrita Inst Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Kochi, Kerala, India
关键词
Disc revision surgery; recurrent single-level disc prolapse; re-do minimally invasive lumbar discectomy; re-do discectomy; PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW; DISKECTOMY; FUSION; MICRODISCECTOMY; SURGERY; DISEASE; TLIF;
D O I
10.1080/02688697.2017.1368451
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Background: Though different techniques have been successfully employed in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation, the one which should be considered most ideal has remained a controversy, particularly since there are currently no generally accepted guidelines for surgical care. Objective: To review previous publications comparing the available operative options, with the aim of determining if any of the available interventions gives better outcomes compared to others. Methods: A systematic literature review of previous publications comparing various techniques employed in the surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation. Results: All publications investigated in this review clearly demonstrated quite comparable outcomes, with no superiority of one method over the other. Conclusion: In view of the currently available data and evidence, minimally invasive techniques for revision of recurrent disc herniation do not really appear to be superior to the conventional open surgical approaches and vice-versa. We suggest the management strategy for surgical treatment of each case of recurrence to be simply based on the experience of the surgeon, the available facilities and equipment. Fusion should not be undertaken in all recurrences but should only be considered as an option for revision when spinal instability, spinal deformity or associated radiculopathy is present.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 708
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
RECURRENT LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION AFTER SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: INCIDENCE AND HEALTH CARE COST ANALYSIS [J].
Ambrossi, Giannina L. Garces ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Long, Donlin M. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 65 (03) :574-578
[2]
Azhari S, 2014, NOVEL BIOMED, V2, P10
[3]
Results of instrumented posterolateral fusion in failed back surgery [J].
Badawy, Walid Salah ;
El Masry, M. A. ;
Radwan, Y. A. ;
El Haddidi, T. T. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 30 (04) :305-308
[4]
Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Surgery for Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Recurrent Disc Herniation [J].
Chen, Huan-Chieh ;
Lee, Chih-Hsun ;
Wei, Li ;
Lui, Tai-Ngar ;
Lin, Tien-Jen .
NEUROLOGY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[5]
The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials Clinical article [J].
Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar H. ;
Juraschek, Stephen P. ;
Schultz, Lonni R. ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Bydon, Ali .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (05) :452-462
[6]
Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review [J].
Drazin, Doniel ;
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice ;
Al-Khouja, Lutfi ;
Yang, Dongyan ;
Johnson, Patrick ;
Kim, Terrence ;
Boakye, Maxwell .
CUREUS, 2016, 8 (05)
[7]
El Shazly Ayman A, 2013, Asian J Neurosurg, V8, P139, DOI 10.4103/1793-5482.121685
[8]
Percutaneous discectomy: Minimally invasive method for treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation [J].
Eloqayli, Haytham ;
Al-omari, Mamoon .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 114 (07) :871-875
[9]
Long-term results of disc excision for recurrent lumbar disc herniation with or without posterolateral fusion [J].
Fu, TS ;
Lai, PL ;
Tsai, TT ;
Niu, CC ;
Chen, LH ;
Chen, WJ .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (24) :2830-2834
[10]
Greenberg MS, 2010, SURG TREATMENT RECUR, P460