Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20 year follow-up

被引:92
作者
Sandblom, Gabriel [1 ]
Varenhorst, Eberhard [2 ]
Rosell, Johan [3 ]
Lofman, Owe [4 ]
Carlsson, Per [5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, CLINTEC, S-14186 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Ctr Oncol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Math Sci & Technol, N-1432 As, Norway
[5] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Hlth Technol Assessment, Linkoping, Sweden
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2011年 / 342卷
关键词
DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; CARCINOMA; OVERDETECTION; MORTALITY; REGISTER; BENEFITS; SWEDEN; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.d1539
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess whether screening for prostate cancer reduces prostate cancer specific mortality. Design Population based randomised controlled trial. Setting Department of Urology, Norrkoping, and the South-East Region Prostate Cancer Register. Participants All men aged 50-69 in the city of Norrkoping, Sweden, identified in 1987 in the National Population Register (n=9026). Intervention From the study population, 1494 men were randomly allocated to be screened by including every sixth man from a list of dates of birth. These men were invited to be screened every third year from 1987 to 1996. On the first two occasions screening was done by digital rectal examination only. From 1993, this was combined with prostate specific antigen testing, with 4 mu g/L as cut off. On the fourth occasion (1996), only men aged 69 or under at the time of the investigation were invited. Main outcome measures Data on tumour stage, grade, and treatment from the South East Region Prostate Cancer Register. Prostate cancer specific mortality up to 31 December 2008. Results In the four screenings from 1987 to 1996 attendance was 1161/1492 (78%), 957/1363 (70%), 895/1210 (74%), and 446/606 (74%), respectively. There were 85 cases (5.7%) of prostate cancer diagnosed in the screened group and 292 (3.9%) in the control group. The risk ratio for death from prostate cancer in the screening group was 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.73). In a Cox proportional hazard analysis comparing prostate cancer specific survival in the control group with that in the screened group, the hazard ratio for death from prostate cancer was 1.23 (0.94 to 1.62; P=0.13). After adjustment for age at start of the study, the hazard ratio was 1.58 (1.06 to 2.36; P=0.024). Conclusions After 20 years of follow-up the rate of death from prostate cancer did not differ significantly between men in the screening group and those in the control group.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Albertsen PC, 2010, UROLOGY, V75, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.078
[2]   Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial [J].
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Grubb, Robert L., III ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Chia, David ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Fouad, Mona N. ;
Gelmann, Edward P. ;
Kvale, Paul A. ;
Reding, Douglas J. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Yokochi, Lance A. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
O'Brien, Barbara ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Riley, Thomas L. ;
Hayes, Richard B. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Izmirlian, Grant ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Prorok, Philip C. ;
Gohagan, John K. ;
Berg, Christine D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) :1310-1319
[3]   The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register - a sample survey for year 1998 [J].
Barlow, Lotti ;
Westergren, Kerstin ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Talback, Mats .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2009, 48 (01) :27-33
[4]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer:: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomized trial [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Filen, Frej ;
Ruutu, Mirja ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Bratell, Stefan ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (16) :1144-1154
[5]   Impact of health technology assessments [J].
Britton, M ;
Jonsson, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (04) :824-831
[6]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
CARLSSON, P ;
PEDERSEN, KV ;
VARENHORST, E .
HEALTH POLICY, 1990, 16 (03) :241-253
[7]   Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer [J].
Draisma, G ;
Boer, R ;
Otto, SJ ;
van der Cruijsen, IW ;
Damhuis, RAM ;
Schröder, FH ;
de Koning, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) :868-878
[8]   Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer [J].
Esserman, Laura ;
Shieh, Yiwey ;
Thompson, Ian .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (15) :1685-1692
[9]   Reliability of death certificates in prostate cancer patients [J].
Fall, Katja ;
Stromberg, Fredrik ;
Rosell, Johan ;
Andren, Ove ;
Varenhorst, Eberhard .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 42 (04) :352-357
[10]   Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer [J].
Heijnsdijk, E. A. M. ;
der Kinderen, A. ;
Wever, E. M. ;
Draisma, G. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
de Koning, H. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (11) :1833-1838