A randomised trial of accelerated and conventional radiotherapy for stage III and IV squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study

被引:88
作者
Poulsen, MG [1 ]
Denham, JW
Peters, LJ
Lamb, DS
Spry, NA
Hindley, A
Krawitz, H
Hamilton, C
Keller, J
Tripcony, L
Walker, Q
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hosp, Queensland Radium Inst, Div Oncol Inc, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia
[2] Newcastle Mater Misericordia Hosp, Hunter Reg Mail Serv, Dept Radiat Oncol, Newcastle, NSW 2310, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Melbourne 3000, Australia
[4] Wellington Hosp, Wellington Canc Ctr, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Geelong Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[6] Auckland Hosp, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
head and neck cancer; accelerated radiotherapy; randomised trial;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00347-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to determine whether there were differences in the disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and a continuous 3 week accelerated radiotherapy regimen (ART) in stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. Patients and methods: Patients from 14 centres throughout Australia and New Zealand were randomly assigned to either CRT, using a single 2 Gy/day to a dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 49 days or to ART, using 1.8 Gy twice a day to a dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions in 24 days. Treatment allocation was stratified for site and stage. The accrual began in 1991 and the trial was closed in 1998 when the target of 350 patients was reached. Results: The median potential follow-up time was 53 months (range, 14-101). The DFS at 5 years was 41% (95% CI, 33-50%) for ART and 35% (95% CI, 27-43%) for CRT (P = 0.323) and the hazard ratio was 0.87 in favour of ART (95% CI, 0.66-1.15). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 40% for CRT and 46% for ART (P = 0.398) and the loco-regional control was 47% for CRT vs. 52% for ART (P = 0.300). The respective hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.2) and 0.85 (0.62-1.16), favouring the accelerated arm. In the ART arm, confluent mucositis was more severe (94 vs. 71%; P < 0.001) and peaked about 3 weeks earlier than in the CRT arm, but healing appeared complete in all cases. There were statistically significant reductions in the probability of grade 2 or greater late soft tissue effects over time in the ART arm (P < 0.05), except for the mucous membrane where late effects were similar in both arms. Conclusions: Differences in DFS, disease-specific survival and loco-regional control have not been demonstrated. ART resulted in more acute mucosal toxicity, but this did not result in greater prolongation of the treatment time compared with the CRT arm. There were less late effects in the ART arm, with the exception of late mucosal effects. This trial has confirmed that tumour cell repopulation occurs during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. However, it has also provided additional evidence that overall improvements in the therapeutic ratio using accelerated fractionation strategies are seriously constrained by the need to limit total doses to levels that do not exceed acute mucosal tolerance. The accelerated schedule tested has been shown in this trial to be an acceptable alternative to conventionally fractionated irradiation to 70 Gy. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Do acute mucosal reactions lead to consequential late reactions in patients with head and neck cancer? [J].
Denham, JW ;
Peters, LJ ;
Johansen, J ;
Poulsen, M ;
Lamb, DS ;
Hindley, A ;
O'Brien, PC ;
Spry, NA ;
Penniment, M ;
Krawitz, H ;
Williamson, S ;
Bear, J ;
Tripcony, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 52 (02) :157-164
[2]   A randomised multicentre trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Dische, S ;
Saunders, M ;
Barrett, A ;
Harvey, A ;
Gibson, D ;
Parmar, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (02) :123-136
[3]   THE RECORDING OF MORBIDITY RELATED TO RADIOTHERAPY [J].
DISCHE, S ;
WARBURTON, MF ;
JONES, D ;
LARTIGAU, E .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 16 (02) :103-108
[4]   A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: First report of RTOG 9003 [J].
Fu, KK ;
Pajak, TF ;
Trotti, A ;
Jones, CU ;
Spencer, SA ;
Phillips, TL ;
Garden, AS ;
Ridge, JA ;
Cooper, JS ;
Ang, KK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (01) :7-16
[5]   TREATMENT OF ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER WITH ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION [J].
GRAY, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (01) :9-12
[6]  
Hamilton C, 1999, Australas Radiol, V43, P227, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.00639.x
[7]   Accelerated fractionation (AF) compared to conventional fractionation (CF) improves loco-regional control in the radiotherapy of advanced head and neck cancers: results of the EORTC 22851 randomized trial [J].
Horiot, JC ;
Bontemps, P ;
vandenBogaert, W ;
LeFur, R ;
vandenWeijngaert, D ;
Bolla, M ;
Bernier, J ;
Lusinchi, A ;
Stuschke, M ;
LopezTorrecilla, J ;
Begg, AC ;
Pierart, M ;
Collette, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (02) :111-121
[8]   A randomised trial of accelerated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Jackson, SM ;
Weir, LM ;
Hay, JH ;
Tsang, VHY ;
Durham, JS .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 43 (01) :39-46
[9]   ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION RADIOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER [J].
LAMB, DS ;
SPRY, NA ;
GRAY, AJ ;
JOHNSON, AD ;
ALEXANDER, SR ;
DALLY, MJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1990, 18 (02) :107-116
[10]   Long-term results of accelerated radiation treatment for advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Lamb, DS ;
Denham, JW ;
Morum, PE ;
Gray, AJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 49 (01) :29-32