Attitudinal ambivalence, rumination, and forgiveness of partner transgressions in marriage

被引:55
作者
Kachadourian, LK
Fincham, F
Davila, J
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Psychol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
marriage; forgiveness; transgression; ambivalence; rumination;
D O I
10.1177/0146167204271595
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although positive and negative attitudes toward a transgressor are related to increased and decreased forgiveness, respectively, prior research has failed to investigate forgiveness among those who feel both positively and negatively toward a transgressor. Therefore, the authors examined such ambivalence and its relationship to forgiveness. It was hypothesized that spouses with ambivalent attitudes toward their partner will be less forgiving of a partner transgression because such an event is likely to prime the negative component of their ambivalence. Because ruminating about a transgression also has the potential to prime the negative component of one's ambivalence, an interaction between rumination and ambivalence was predicted. Data from 87 married couples showed that greater attitudinal ambivalence toward the partner was associated with decreased forgiveness only when husbands and wives thought about the transgression frequently; ambivalence was not related to forgiveness in the absence of rumination. The implications of these findings for understanding forgiveness in marriage and for increasing forgiveness among married couples are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 342
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]  
ALMABUK RH, 1998, J FAMILY PSYCHOTHERA, V9, P11
[3]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, AMOS USERS GUIDE VER
[4]   The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence [J].
Bell, DW ;
Esses, VM ;
Maio, GR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 1996, 28 (01) :12-18
[5]   Ambivalence and response amplification toward native peoples [J].
Bell, DW ;
Esses, VM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 27 (12) :1063-1084
[6]   The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace [J].
Bradfield, M ;
Aquino, K .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1999, 25 (05) :607-631
[7]   A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL INDEXES FOR MEASURING ATTITUDE AMBIVALENCE [J].
BRECKLER, SJ .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1994, 54 (02) :350-365
[8]  
Cacioppo J T, 1997, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V1, P3, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
[9]   INDICATORS OF AGGRESSION - THE DISSIPATION RUMINATION SCALE [J].
CAPRARA, GV .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1986, 7 (06) :763-769
[10]   A NEW LOOK AT DISSONANCE THEORY [J].
COOPER, J ;
FAZIO, RH .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 17 :229-266