Specialty training and mortality after esophageal cancer resection

被引:100
作者
Dimick, JB
Goodney, PP
Orringer, MB
Birkmeyer, JD
机构
[1] VA Med Ctr, VA Outcomes Grp, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Ctr Evaluat Clin Sci, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ctr Med, M SCORE, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.01.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background. Surgeons with advanced training have lower mortality rates with some surgical procedures. The objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of thoracic surgery training on mortality rates of esophageal cancer resection. Methods. We studied esophageal cancer resection in the national Medicare population during 1998 and 1999. Operative mortality rates (in-hospital or 30-day) were compared for thoracic surgeons and other surgeons, adjusting for patient characteristics, hospital volume, and surgeon volume. Surgeons with specialty training in thoracic surgery were those certified by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery. Results. Of the 1,946 patients, 625 (32%) had their operation performed by a thoracic surgeon. After adjustment for patient characteristics, mortality rates were 37% (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.82) higher for surgeons without specialty training compared with thoracic surgeons (adjusted mortality 16.3% versus 12.4%; P = 0.01). However, differences in mortality between high-volume and low-volume hospitals (24.3% versus 11.4%; p < 0.001) and surgeons (20.7% versus 10.7%; p < 0.001) were larger than those between thoracic and general surgeons. Although thoracic surgeons had lower mortality rates after adjusting for hospital volume, the effect of thoracic surgery training was no longer significant after accounting for surgeon volume (odds ratio, 1.23; 93% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.63). Conclusions. Specialty training in thoracic surgery has an independent association with lower mortality after esophageal resection. But specialty training appears to be less important than hospital and surgeon volume. (c) 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 286
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[2]
Influence of surgical subspecialty training on in-hospital mortality for gastrectomy and colectomy patients [J].
Callahan, MA ;
Christos, PJ ;
Gold, HT ;
Mushlin, AI ;
Daly, JM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (04) :629-636
[3]
Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: An effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume [J].
Cowan, JA ;
Dimick, JB ;
Thompson, BG ;
Stanley, JC ;
Upchurch, GR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 195 (06) :814-821
[4]
National variation in operative mortality rates for esophageal resection and the need for quality improvement [J].
Dimick, JB ;
Cowan, JA ;
Ailawadi, G ;
Wainess, RM ;
Upchurch, GR .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (12) :1305-1309
[5]
Selective referral to high-volume hospitals - Estimating potentially avoidable deaths [J].
Dudley, RA ;
Johansen, KL ;
Brand, R ;
Rennie, DJ ;
Milstein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (09) :1159-1166
[6]
Goodney PP, 2005, ANN SURG, V241, P179
[7]
Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature [J].
Halm, EA ;
Lee, C ;
Chassin, MR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (06) :511-520
[8]
Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy [J].
Hannan, EL ;
Popp, AJ ;
Feustel, P ;
Halm, E ;
Bernardini, G ;
Waldman, J ;
Shah, D ;
Chassin, MR .
STROKE, 2001, 32 (12) :2890-2897
[9]
HEWITT M, 2001, INTERPRETING VOLUME
[10]
Milstein A, 2000, Eff Clin Pract, V3, P313