Cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment: a replication and extension of a cross-lagged panel analysis

被引:141
作者
Burns, JW
Glenn, B
Bruehl, S
Harden, RN
Lofland, K
机构
[1] Finch Univ Hlth Sci Chicago Med Sch, Dept Psychol, N Chicago, IL 60064 USA
[2] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Pain & Rehabil Clin Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
process; outcome; chronic pain; cross-legged analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00029-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Reducing maladaptive cognitions is hypothesized to constitute an active therapeutic process in multidisciplinary pain programs featuring cognitive-behavioral interventions. A cross-lagged panel design was used to determine whether: a) early-treatment cognitive changes predicted late-treatment pain, interference, activity and mood changes, but not vice versa; b) three cognitive factors made unique contributions to outcome; c) substantial cognitive changes preceded substantial improvements in outcome. Sixty-five chronic pain patients, participating in a 4-week multidisciplinary program, completed measures of pain helplessness, catastrophizing, pain-related anxiety (process factors), pain severity, interference, activity level and depression (outcomes) at pre-, mid- and posttreatment. Results showed that early-treatment reductions in pain helplessness predicted late-treatment decreases in pain and interference, but not vice versa, and that early-treatment reductions in catastrophizing and pain-related anxiety predicted late-treatment improvements in pain severity, but not vice versa. Findings suggested that the three process factors predicted improvements mostly in common. However, little evidence was found that large early-treatment reductions in process variables preceded extensive improvements in pain. Findings replicate those of a recent report regarding cross-lagged effects, and offer support that cognitive changes may indeed influence late-treatment changes in outcomes. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1182
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J REHAB HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:IJRH.0000008153.61553.60
[2]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[3]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[4]   Cognitive and physical capacity process variables predict long-term outcome after treatment of chronic pain [J].
Burns, JW ;
Johnson, BJ ;
Mahoney, N ;
Devine, J ;
Pawl, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 66 (02) :434-439
[5]   Validity of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS): prediction of physical capacity variables [J].
Burns, JW ;
Mullen, JT ;
Higdon, L ;
Wei, JM ;
Lansky, D .
PAIN, 2000, 84 (2-3) :247-252
[6]   Do changes in cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain? A cross-lagged panel analysis [J].
Burns, JW ;
Kubilus, A ;
Bruehl, S ;
Harden, RN ;
Lofland, K .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 71 (01) :81-91
[7]   DOES NONSURGICAL PAIN CENTER TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN RETURN PATIENTS TO WORK - A REVIEW AND METAANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE [J].
CUTLER, RB ;
FISHBAIN, DA ;
ROSOMOFF, HL ;
ABDELMOTY, E ;
KHALIL, TM ;
ROSOMOFF, RS .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (06) :643-652
[8]   DETERMINANTS OF CHANGE IN COGNITIVE THERAPY FOR DEPRESSION [J].
DERUBEIS, RJ ;
FEELEY, M .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1990, 14 (05) :469-482
[9]   The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression [J].
Feeley, M ;
DeRubeis, RJ ;
Gelfand, LA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 67 (04) :578-582
[10]  
Finkel SE, 1995, CAUSAL ANAL PANEL DA