Comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals for impulse responses of German monetary systems

被引:53
作者
Benkwitz, A
Lütkepohl, H
Wolters, J
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Stat & Okonometr, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Stat & Okonometr, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
impulse response; bootstrap methods; money demand system; monetary policy;
D O I
10.1017/S1365100501018041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is argued that standard impulse response analysis based on vector autoregressive models has a number of shortcomings. Although the impulse responses are estimated quantities, measures for sampling variability such as confidence intervals sometimes are not provided. If confidence intervals are given, they often are based on bootstrap methods with dubious theoretical properties. These problems are illustrated using two German monetary systems. Proposals are made for improving current practice. Special emphasis is placed on systems with cointegrated variables.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 100
页数:20
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, EMPIR ECON
[2]  
[Anonymous], LARGE SCALE MACROECO
[3]  
Benkwitz A., 2000, Econometric Reviews, V19, P69
[4]  
Bruggemann I., 1998, ECONOMETRICS THEORY, P205
[5]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, V1st ed., DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[6]  
Hall P., 1992, BOOTSTRAP EDGEWORTH
[7]   Small-sample confidence intervals for impulse response functions [J].
Kilian, L .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1998, 80 (02) :218-230
[9]  
LUTKEPOHL H, 1998, EMPIR ECON, V23, P371
[10]  
Lutkepohl H., 1991, INTRO MULTIPLE TIME