Using energy scenarios to explore alternative energy pathways in California

被引:104
作者
Ghanadan, R
Koomey, JG
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, ERG, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, End Use Forecasting Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
energy scenarios; California; energy forecasting;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2003.11.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops and analyzes four energy scenarios for California that are both exploratory and quantitative. The business-as-usual scenario represents a pathway guided by outcomes and expectations emerging from California's energy crisis. Three alternative scenarios represent contexts where clean energy plays a greater role in California's energy system: Split Public is driven by local and individual activities; Golden State gives importance to integrated state planning; Patriotic Energy represents a national drive to increase energy independence. Future energy consumption, composition of electricity generation, energy diversity, and greenhouse gas emissions are analyzed for each scenario through 2035. Energy savings, renewable energy, and transportation activities are identified as promising opportunities for achieving alternative energy pathways in California. A combined approach that brings together individual and community activities with state and national policies leads to the largest energy savings, increases in energy diversity, and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Critical challenges in California's energy pathway over the next decades identified by the scenario analysis include dominance of the transportation sector, dependence on fossil fuels, emissions of greenhouse gases, accounting for electricity imports, and diversity of the electricity sector. The paper concludes with a set of policy lessons revealed from the California energy scenarios. (c) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1142
页数:26
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Spatial and temporal distributions of US winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements [J].
Archer, CL ;
Jacobson, MZ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D9)
[2]  
Brown MA, 2001, ENERG POLICY, V29, P1179, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00066-0
[3]   Electricity use in California: past trends and present usage patterns [J].
Brown, RE ;
Kooney, JG .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (09) :849-864
[4]   What can history teach us? A retrospective examination of long-term energy forecasts for the United States [J].
Craig, PP ;
Gadgil, A ;
Koomey, JG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 27 :83-118
[5]  
Duke R, 1999, ENERGY J, V20, P15
[6]   Windows on the future:: Global scenarios & sustainability [J].
Gallopin, GC ;
Raskin, P .
ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 40 (03) :6-+
[7]   Strategies for cost-effective carbon reductions: a sensitivity analysis of alternative scenarios [J].
Gumerman, E ;
Koomey, JG ;
Brown, MA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (14) :1313-1323
[8]  
Kerr E, 2002, GENET ENG NEWS, V22, P20
[9]   USING SCENARIOS TO EXPLORE FUTURE ENERGY DEMAND IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES [J].
SCHIPPER, L ;
MEYERS, S .
ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (03) :264-275
[10]  
WACK P, 1985, HARVARD BUS REV, V63, P139