Differential estrogen receptor binding of estrogenic substances: a species comparison

被引:260
作者
Matthews, J
Celius, T
Halgren, R
Zacharewski, T
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biochem, Inst Environm Toxicol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Natl Food Safety & Technol Ctr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
estrogen receptor; phytoestrogens competitive binding; estrogenic;
D O I
10.1016/S0960-0760(00)00126-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The study investigated the ability of 34 natural and synthetic chemicals to compete with [H-3]17 beta -estradiol (E2) for binding to bacterially expressed glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-estrogen receptors (ER) fusion proteins from five different species. Fusion proteins consisted of the ER D, E and F domains of human alpha (GST-hER alpha def), mouse alpha (GST-mER alpha def), chicken (GST-cERdef), green anole (GST-aERdef) and rainbow trout ERs (GST-rtERdef). All five fusion proteins displayed high affinity for E2 with dissociation constants (K-d) ranging from 0.3 to 0.9 nM. Although, the fusion proteins exhibited similar binding preferences and binding affinities for many of the chemicals, several differences were observed. For example, alpha -zearalenol bound with greater affinity to GST-rtERdef than E2, which was in contrast to other GST-ERdef fusion proteins examined. Coumestrol, genistein and naringenin bound with higher affinity to the GST-aERdef, than to the other GST-ERdef fusion proteins. Many of the industrial chemicals examined preferentially bound to GST-rtERdef. Bisphenol A, 4-t-octylphenol and o,p' DDT bound with approximately a ten-fold greater affinity to GST-rtERdef than to other GST-ERdefs. Methoxychlor, p,p'-DDT, o,p'-DDE, p,p'-DDE, alpha -endosulfan and dieldrin weakly bound to the ERs from the human, mouse, chicken and green anole. In contrast, these compounds completely displaced [H-3]E2 from GST-rtERdef. These results demonstrate that ERs from different species exhibit differential ligand preferences and relative binding affinities for estrogenic compounds and that these differences may be due to the variability in the amino acid sequence within their respective ER ligand binding domains. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site [J].
Anstead, GM ;
Carlson, KE ;
Katzenellenbogen, JA .
STEROIDS, 1997, 62 (03) :268-303
[3]   Differential response of estrogen receptor α and estrogen receptor β to partial estrogen agonists/antagonists [J].
Barkhem, T ;
Carlsson, B ;
Nilsson, Y ;
Enmark, E ;
Gustafsson, JÅ ;
Nilsson, S .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 54 (01) :105-112
[4]  
Bergeron JM, 1998, DEV GROWTH DIFFER, V40, P243
[5]   Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor [J].
Brzozowski, AM ;
Pike, ACW ;
Dauter, Z ;
Hubbard, RE ;
Bonn, T ;
Engstrom, O ;
Ohman, L ;
Greene, GL ;
Gustafsson, JA ;
Carlquist, M .
NATURE, 1997, 389 (6652) :753-758
[6]   DECLINING SEMEN QUALITY AND INCREASING INCIDENCE OF TESTICULAR CANCER - IS THERE A COMMON-CAUSE [J].
CARLSEN, E ;
GIWERCMAN, A ;
KEIDING, N ;
SKAKKEBAEK, NE .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 103 :137-139
[7]   DEVELOPMENTAL EFFECTS OF ENDOCRINE-DISRUPTING CHEMICALS IN WILDLIFE AND HUMANS [J].
COLBORN, T ;
SAAL, FSV ;
SOTO, AM .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 101 (05) :378-384
[8]   Failure of chloro-S-triazine-derived compounds to induce estrogen receptor-mediated responses in vivo and in vitro [J].
Connor, K ;
Howell, J ;
Chen, I ;
Berhane, K ;
Sciarretta, C ;
Safe, S ;
Zacharewski, T .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 30 (01) :93-101
[9]   Estrogenic activity of chlordecone, o,p'-DDT and o,p'-DDE in juvenile rainbow trout: Induction of vitellogenesis and interaction with hepatic estrogen binding sites [J].
Donohoe, RM ;
Curtis, LR .
AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 36 (1-2) :31-52
[10]  
ECKERT RL, 1982, J BIOL CHEM, V257, P8840