Focus on research methods: Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta-analyses

被引:87
作者
Conn, VS [1 ]
Rantz, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Nursing S317, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
meta-analysis; research methods;
D O I
10.1002/nur.10092
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Meta-analyses synthesize multiple Primary studies and identify patterns of relationships. Differences in primary study methodological quality must be addressed for meta-analysis to produce meaningful results. No single standard exists for addressing these quality variations. Quality measurement scales are fraught with development and application Problems. Several strategies have been proposed to address quality. Researchers can set minimum levels for inclusion or require that certain quality attributes be present. An inclusive method is to weight effect sizes by quality scores. This allows the inclusion of diverse studies but relies on questionable quality measures. By considering quality an empirical question, meta-analysts can examine associations between quality and effect sizes and thus preserve the purpose of meta-analysis to systematically examine data. Researchers increasingly are combining strategies to overcome the limitations of using a single approach. Future work to develop valid measures of primary study quality dimensions will improve the ability of meta-analysis to inform research and nursing practice. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 333
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL PSYCHOL ED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Synthesizing research
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SYSTEMS RATE STRENGT
[4]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND CONCLUSIONS IN REVIEWS OF SPINAL MANIPULATION [J].
ASSENDELFT, WJJ ;
KOES, BW ;
KNIPSCHILD, PG ;
BOUTER, LM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (24) :1942-1948
[5]   Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials [J].
Balk, EM ;
Bonis, PAL ;
Moskowitz, H ;
Schmid, CH ;
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Wang, CC ;
Lau, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (22) :2973-2982
[6]  
Beck CT, 1999, RES NURS HEALTH, V22, P523, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199912)22:6<523::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-9
[8]   METAANALYSIS OF DIABETES PATIENT EDUCATION RESEARCH - VARIATIONS IN INTERVENTION EFFECTS ACROSS STUDIES [J].
BROWN, SA .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1992, 15 (06) :409-419
[9]   BIAS IN TREATMENT ASSIGNMENT IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
CELANO, P ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (22) :1358-1361
[10]   A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
BLACKBURN, B ;
SILVERMAN, B ;
SCHROEDER, B ;
REITMAN, D ;
AMBROZ, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1981, 2 (01) :31-49