Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States

被引:131
作者
Katz, SJ
Kabeto, M
Langa, KM
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Med, Div Gen Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Vet Affairs Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Re, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, CHOICES, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 284卷 / 23期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.23.3022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Projected demographic shifts in the US population over the next 50 years will cause families, health care practitioners, and policymakers to confront a marked increase in the number of people with disabilities living in the community. Concerns about the adequacy of community support are particularly salient to women, who make up a disproportionate number of disabled elderly people and who may be particularly vulnerable because they are more likely to live alone with limited financial resources. Objective To address gender differences in receipt of informal and formal home care. Design, Setting, and Participants Nationally representative survey conducted in 1993 among 7443 noninstitutionalized people (4538 women and 2905 men) aged 70 years or older. Main Outcome Measure Number of hours per week of informal (generally unpaid) and formal (generally paid) home care received by survey participants who reported any activity of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) impairment (n = 3109) com pared by gender and living arrangement and controlling for other factors. Results Compared with disabled men, disabled women were much more likely to be living alone (45.4% vs 16.8%, P<.001) and much less likely to be living with a spouse (27.8% vs 73.6%, P<.001). Overall, women received fewer hours of informal care per week than men (15.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-16.9 vs 21.2 hours; 95% CI, 19.7-22.8). Married disabled women received many fewer hours per week of informal home care than married disabled men (14.8 hours; 95% CI, 13.7-15.8 vs 26.2 hours; 95% CI, 24.6-27.9). Children (>80% women) were the dominant caregivers for disabled women while wives were the dominant caregivers of disabled men. Gender differences in formal home care were small (2.8 hours for women; 95% CI, 2.5-3.1 vs 2.1 hours for men; 95% CI, 1.7-2.4). Conclusion Large gender disparities appear to exist in the receipt of informal home care for disabled elderly people in the United States, even within married households, Programs providing home care support for disabled elderly people need to consider these large gender disparities and the burden they impose on families when developing intervention strategies in the community.
引用
收藏
页码:3022 / 3027
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Population aging: A comparison among industrialized countries [J].
Anderson, GF ;
Hussey, PS .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2000, 19 (03) :191-203
[2]   MEN AND WOMEN AGING DIFFERENTLY [J].
BARER, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 38 (01) :29-40
[3]   Determining the amount of help used by disabled elderly persons at home: The role of coping resources [J].
Boaz, RF ;
Hu, JX .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1997, 52 (06) :S317-S324
[4]   THE STRUCTURE OF INFORMAL CARE - ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BY RACE [J].
BURTON, L ;
KASPER, J ;
SHORE, A ;
CAGNEY, K ;
LAVEIST, T ;
CUBBIN, C ;
GERMAN, P .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1995, 35 (06) :744-752
[5]  
*COLL STAT, 1999, STATA REF MAN
[6]  
Duan N., 1983, J EC BUSINESS STATIS, V1, P115, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1391852, DOI 10.1080/07350015.1983.10509330]
[7]  
*HLTH CAR FIN ADM, 1998, NAT HLTH CAR EXP PRO
[8]   Persons with chronic conditions - Their prevalence and costs [J].
Hoffman, C ;
Rice, D ;
Sung, HY .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (18) :1473-1479
[9]   Patterns and predictors of formal and informal care among elderly persons living in board and care homes [J].
Hopp, FP .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1999, 39 (02) :167-176
[10]   Caregiving for parents and parents-in-law: Is gender important? [J].
IngersollDayton, B ;
Starrels, ME ;
Dowler, D .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1996, 36 (04) :483-491