Too much natural history, or too little?

被引：21

作者：

Arnold, SL ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Zool, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA

来源：

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR | 2003年 / 65卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1006/anbe.2003.2143

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

A number of commentators have recently expressed concern about the fate of both natural history and naturalists in the modern world. In this essay I examine those concerns from a historical perspective. From this standpoint, I conclude that natural history is alive and well, but its future critically depends upon conceptual infusions from adjacent disciplines. Naturalists are proliferating rather than dying out. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

引用

页码：1065 / 1068

页数：4

共 11 条

[1]

[Anonymous], GROWTH BIOL THOUGHT

[2] THE ROLE OF NATURAL-HISTORY IN CONTEMPORARY BIOLOGY [J].