Gravity changes due to the Sumatra-Andaman and Nias earthquakes as detected by the GRACE satellites: a reexamination

被引:26
作者
Einarsson, I. [1 ]
Hoechner, A. [1 ]
Wang, R. [1 ]
Kusche, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
Satellite geodesy; Transient deformation; Time variable gravity; Dynamics: gravity and tectonics; TEMPORAL GRAVITY; DEFORMATION; DECEMBER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04756.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
P>In this paper, we study the geoid changes caused by the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (2004 December 26) and the Nias earthquake (2005 March 28) using data from the gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) satellites. New is that we explore the possibility to separate the effects of the Sumatra-Andaman and Nias earthquakes. Based on correlation analysis we investigate the separability of the Sumatra-Andaman and Nias signals, and the feasibility of separating the non-seismic linear trend from the time-dependent post-seismic relaxation effect. As input data, we use 76 months of global geopotential coefficients from the GFZ release 4 (RL04) of GRACE data. To suppress unphysical artefacts in GRACE data ('striping'), the GRACE coefficients are smoothed with an anisotropic decorrelation filter. Model parameters are estimated through a Bayesian approach. We compare our results with geophysical models of both earthquakes, calculated based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory. The slip models used are inverted from GPS measurements. Our findings indicate that, the inversion of GRACE data for the Sumatra-Andaman effect will contain significant signal from the Nias earthquake, and will benefit from removing the modelled Nias effect from the data. Comparing GRACE measurements to geophysical models reveals significant differences. We suggest, how the GPS-calibrated models may be improved to better fit the GRACE data. In the first months after the earthquake, we also find evidence for a fast process in the Andaman sea, possibly due to aseismic slip. Similar phenomena were observed in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 747
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Andersen O., 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, P1
[2]   Coseismic slip distributions of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes from GPS static offsets [J].
Banerjee, Paramesh ;
Pollitz, Fred ;
Nagarajan, B. ;
Burgmann, Roland .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 97 (01) :S86-S102
[3]   Separation of coseismic and postseismic gravity changes for the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from 4.6 yr of GRACE observations and modelling of the coseismic change by normal-modes summation [J].
de Linage, Caroline ;
Rivera, Luis ;
Hinderer, Jacques ;
Boy, Jean-Paul ;
Rogister, Yves ;
Lambotte, Sophie ;
Biancale, Richard .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 176 (03) :695-714
[4]   Retrieving earthquake signature in grace gravity solutions [J].
de Viron, O. ;
Panet, I. ;
Mikhailov, V. ;
Van Camp, M. ;
Diament, M. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 174 (01) :14-20
[5]   A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators:: model tuning and validation [J].
Döll, P ;
Kaspar, F ;
Lehner, B .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 270 (1-2) :105-134
[6]  
FLECHTNER F, 2009, RELEASE NOTES GFZ RL
[7]  
Flechtner F, 2007, GFZ LEVEL 2 PROCESSI
[8]  
GUNDLICH B, 2008, 6 HOT S THEOR COMP G
[9]   Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement [J].
Han, SC ;
Shum, CK ;
Jekeli, C ;
Kuo, CY ;
Wilson, C ;
Seo, KW .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 163 (01) :18-25
[10]   Spatiospectral localization of global geopotential fields from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) reveals the coseismic gravity change owing to the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake [J].
Han, Shin-Chan ;
Simons, Frederik J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2008, 113 (B1)