A software toes for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms

被引:107
作者
Harms, WB
Low, DA
Wong, JW
Purdy, JA
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
关键词
3D radiation therapy treatment planning; dose calculation; dose calculation verification;
D O I
10.1118/1.598363
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Current methods for evaluating modern radiation therapy treatment planning (RTP) systems include the manual superposition of calculated and measured isodose curves and the comparison of a limited number of calculated and measured point doses. Both techniques have significant limitations in providing quantitative evaluations of the large number of dose data generated by modern RTP systems. More sophisticated comparison techniques have been presented in the literature, including dose-difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) analyses. A software tool has been developed that uses superimposed isodose plots, dose-difference, and DTA distributions to quantify errors in computed dose distributions. Dose-difference and DTA analyses are overly sensitive in regions of high- and low-dose gradient, respectively. The logical union of locations that fail both dose-difference and DTA acceptance criteria, termed the composite evaluation, is calculated and displayed. The composite evaluation provides a method for the physicist to efficiently identify regions that fail both the dose-difference and DTA acceptance criteria. The tool provides a computer platform for the quantitative comparison of calculated and measured dose distributions. (C) 1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(98)00410-6].
引用
收藏
页码:1830 / 1836
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Systematic verification of a three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm [J].
Cheng, A ;
Harms, WB ;
Gerber, RL ;
Wong, JW ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (05) :685-693
[2]  
DAHLIN H, 1983, ACTA RADIOL ONCOL, V22, P398
[3]  
FRAASS BA, 1995, RAD THERAPY PHYSICS
[4]  
FRAASS BA, 1994, 11 INT C US COMP RAD
[5]  
FRAASS BA, 1996, TELETHERAPY PRESENT
[6]   DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF A PENCIL-BEAM ALGORITHM FOR ELECTRONS EMPLOYING A TWO-DIMENSIONAL HETEROGENEITY CORRECTION [J].
HOGSTROM, KR ;
MILLS, MD ;
MEYER, JA ;
PALTA, JR ;
MELLENBERG, DE ;
MEOZ, RT ;
FIELDS, RS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1984, 10 (04) :561-569
[7]  
*ICRU, 1987, 42 ICRU
[8]  
LOW DA, 1994, 11 INT C US COMP RAD
[9]   EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF A 2D AND 3D ELECTRON PENCIL BEAM ALGORITHM [J].
MAH, E ;
ANTOLAK, J ;
SCRIMGER, JW ;
BATTISTA, JJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1989, 34 (09) :1179-1194
[10]   ADVANCES IN 3-DIMENSIONAL RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS - ROOM-VIEW DISPLAY WITH REAL-TIME INTERACTIVITY [J].
PURDY, JA ;
HARMS, WB ;
MATTHEWS, JW ;
DRZYMALA, R ;
EMAMI, B ;
SIMPSON, JR ;
MANOLIS, J ;
ROSENBERGER, FU .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (04) :933-944