A province-level risk factor analysis of fluoroquinolone consumption patterns in Canada (2000-06)

被引:11
作者
Glass, Shiona K. [1 ]
Pearl, David L. [1 ]
McEwen, Scott A. [1 ]
Finley, Rita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Ctr Foodborne Environm & Zoonot Infect Dis, Guelph, ON, Canada
关键词
antibiotic policy; influenza; antibiotic usage; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; DECREASED SUSCEPTIBILITY; PNEUMOCOCCAL PNEUMONIA; RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; TRACT INFECTIONS; US HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkq225
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
To assess potential risk factors among socioeconomic variables and the rate of influenza for the use of different fluoroquinolone antimicrobials in Canada, and to evaluate modelling fluoroquinolone-use data by two different outcome measures. Fluoroquinolone use was described monthly from 2000 to 2006 by two outcome measurements: defined daily doses and prescription counts. Multivariable linear and negative binomial models were produced with socioeconomic and influenza rate data. Significant socioeconomic predictors varied among the individual fluoroquinolone models, which may reflect the range of infections that are treated with fluoroquinolones. However, socioeconomic variables within the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin models were similar, and indicated that use was highest in advantaged populations, depending on the measures being assessed. The rate of influenza was a significant predictor within models describing levofloxacin use and the defined daily dose model for ciprofloxacin use, after accounting for season. Influenza significantly interacted with the education variable in the levofloxacin defined daily dose model. Significant associations between levofloxacin use and influenza rates, after accounting for season, may suggest that levofloxacin was used to treat secondary bacterial infections or was prescribed inappropriately for seasonal viral respiratory tract infections. Yearly patterns of ciprofloxacin use show that prescribing practices changed; more ciprofloxacin prescriptions were dispensed towards the end of the study period, but for smaller doses or shorter treatment times. Associations with socioeconomic variables suggest that the fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were more likely to be used in advantaged populations, probably due to the high cost of fluoroquinolone antimicrobials in comparison to the penicillin and macrolide groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2019 / 2027
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
[Anonymous], CAN INT PROGR ANT RE
[2]
[Anonymous], 2008, COLL CTR DRUG STAT M
[3]
Strategies for promoting judicious use of antibiotics by doctors and patients [J].
Belongia, EA ;
Schwartz, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7159) :668-671
[4]
Relationship between increased levofloxacin use and decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States [J].
Bhavnani, SM ;
Hammel, JP ;
Jones, RN ;
Ambrose, PG .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2005, 51 (01) :31-37
[5]
Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada [J].
Chen, DK ;
McGeer, A ;
de Azavedo, JC ;
Low, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (04) :233-239
[6]
Social status and susceptibility to respiratory infections [J].
Cohen, S .
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH IN INDUSTRIAL NATIONS: SOCIAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS, 1999, 896 :246-253
[7]
Brief report: Resistance to levofloxacin and failure of treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia. [J].
Davidson, R ;
Cavalcanti, R ;
Brunton, JL ;
Bast, DJ ;
de Azavedo, JCS ;
Kibsey, P ;
Fleming, C ;
Low, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (10) :747-750
[8]
Doohoo I, 2003, VET EPIDEMIOLOGIC RE
[9]
Eng JV, 2003, EMERG INFECT DIS, V9, P1128
[10]
Urinary tract infection among women aged 40 to 65: Behavioral and sexual risk factors [J].
Foxman, B ;
Somsel, P ;
Tallman, P ;
Gillespie, B ;
Raz, R ;
Colodner, R ;
Kandula, D ;
Sobel, JD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (07) :710-718